122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9269023)
1. Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis.
Butterfield KJ; Dagenais M; Clokie C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 9269023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part 1: Technique.
Stella JP; Tharanon W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2391135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants.
Yang J; Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Mar; 87(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 10102603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
Lindh C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning.
Aguiar MF; Marques AP; Carvalho AC; Cavalcanti MG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 18266874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible.
Lindh C; Petersson A; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 8884836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical note. Sagittal tomography as an adjunct to cross-sectional evaluation of select implant sites.
Monahan R; Furkart AJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 9161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
Weingart D; Düker J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
Tal H; Moses O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers.
Perez LA; Brooks SL; Wang HL; Eber RM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jun; 99(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 15897863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional linear tomography: protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites.
Ismail YH; Azarbal M; Kapa SF
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 7722930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
