These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9269024)
1. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film. Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth. Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging. Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films. Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study. Nielsen LL; Hoernoe M; Wenzel A Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography. Svanaes DB; Møystad A; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jul; 82(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8843461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis. Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth. Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Hintze H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands. Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout. Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection. Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]