These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9269025)
1. TACT imaging of primary caries. Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries. Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection. Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays. Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries. Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study. Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of angular disparity of basis images and projection geometry on caries detection using tuned-aperture computed tomography. Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Sep; 92(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 11552158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram. Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain. Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tuned-aperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Barton DJ; Clark SJ; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Aug; 96(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 12931097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth. Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging. Webber RL; Horton RA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 9446991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]