These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9269025)

  • 41. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-aperture computed tomography.
    Nance R; Tyndall D; Levin LG; Trope M
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 11307216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Nair UDP ; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL; Wallace JA
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2001 Dec; 109(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 11767273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An evaluation of the diagnostic yield from bitewing radiographs of small approximal and occlusal carious lesions in a low prevalence sample in vitro using different film types and speeds.
    Ricketts DN; Whaites EJ; Kidd EA; Brown JE; Wilson RF
    Br Dent J; 1997 Jan; 182(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 9033139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
    Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 6-bit and 8-bit digital radiography for detecting simulated periodontal lesions.
    Pass B; Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Gregson PH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 8015807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography in the detection of simulated periodontal defects.
    Ramesh A; Ludlow JB; Webber RL; Tyndall DA; Paquette D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 11925546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative evaluation of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography for the detection of mandibular fractures.
    Nair MK; Webber RL; Johnson MP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10980566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.
    Xavier CR; Araujo-Pires AC; Poleti ML; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ferreira O; Capelozza AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 21831972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.
    Ulusu T; Bodur H; Odabaş ME
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.