These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9269025)
61. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films. Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects. Nair MK; Bezik J J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries. Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print. Otis LL; Sherman RG J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries. Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries. Hintze H; Christoffersen L; Wenzel A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography. Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries. Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection. Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography. Russell M; Pitts NB Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis. Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth. Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis. Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions. Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film. Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. Naitoh M; Yuasa H; Toyama M; Shiojima M; Nakamura M; Ushida M; Iida H; Hayashi M; Ariji E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 9474624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors. Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films. Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]