These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9270503)
1. Resolution requirements for digital images in dermatology. Bittorf A; Fartasch M; Schuler G; Diepgen TL J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Aug; 37(2 Pt 1):195-8. PubMed ID: 9270503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital imaging in clinical dermatology across the UK in the year 2001. Strauss RM; Goodfield MJ J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2003 May; 17(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 12702066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of digital image security in Dermatology. Nielson C; West C; Shimizu I Dermatol Online J; 2015 Oct; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 26632792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital images in the diagnosis of wound healing problems. Roth AC; Reid JC; Puckett CL; Concannon MJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Feb; 103(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 9950534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital images in dermatology and the Dermatology Online Atlas on the World Wide Web. Diepgen TL; Eysenbach G J Dermatol; 1998 Dec; 25(12):782-7. PubMed ID: 9990769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resolution in digital imaging: enough already? Siegel DM Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2002 Sep; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 12322995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Real photographic prints from digital images. Ratner D Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):799-800. PubMed ID: 10940069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of decreasing digital image resolution on teledermatology diagnosis. Vidmar DA; Cruess D; Hsieh P; Dolecek Q; Pak H; Gwynn M; Maggio K; Montemorano A; Powers J; Richards D; Sperling L; Wong H; Yeager J Telemed J; 1999; 5(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 10908453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of digital images versus 35-millimeter images. Wilcox LA; Grimwood RE Mil Med; 1995 Sep; 160(9):470-2. PubMed ID: 7478035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Basic digital photography in dermatology. Kaliyadan F; Manoj J; Venkitakrishnan S; Dharmaratnam AD Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2008; 74(5):532-6. PubMed ID: 19052435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of JPEG and FIF compression of color medical images for dermatology. Sneiderman C; Schosser R; Pearson TG Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 7954310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography. Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. Krupinski EA; LeSueur B; Ellsworth L; Levine N; Hansen R; Silvis N; Sarantopoulos P; Hite P; Wurzel J; Weinstein RS; Lopez AM Telemed J; 1999; 5(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 10908439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A portable digital imaging system in dermatology: diagnostic and educational applications. Lyon CC; Harrison PV J Telemed Telecare; 1997; 3 Suppl 1():81-3. PubMed ID: 9218395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic quality of low resolution images for tele-woundcare. Roth AC; Reid JC; Concannon M Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():917-20. PubMed ID: 9929352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Projected digital radiologic images for teaching: balance of image quality with data size constraints. Schellingerhout D; Chew FS; Mullins ME; Gonzalez RG Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 11918368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]