These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 927209)
1. One method for the systematic evaluation of adverse drug experience data within a pharmaceutical firm. Westlin WF; Cuddihy RV; Bursik RJ; Seifert BG; Koelle JG Methods Inf Med; 1977 Oct; 16(4):240-70. PubMed ID: 927209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CONTROL OF DRUG TOXICITY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WESTON JK; WESTON K Practitioner; 1965 Jan; 194():16-21. PubMed ID: 14259685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience in monitoring drug reactions in outpatients. The Kaiser-Permanente Drug Monitoring System. Friedman GD; Collen MF; Harris LE; Van Brunt EE; Davis LS JAMA; 1971 Aug; 217(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 5109088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The drug regulatory system of the United States Food and Drug Administration: a defense of current requirements for safety and efficacy. Simmons HE Int J Health Serv; 1974; 4(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 4829901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US FDA seeks more pharmaceutical industry cash. Zwillich T Lancet; 2007 Feb; 369(9559):357. PubMed ID: 17283497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING AND THE RELATED ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGISTRY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO DRUGS. WESTON JK Med Ann Dist Columbia; 1965 Aug; 34():380-2. PubMed ID: 14338452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The current status of guidelines for clinical research from the viewpoint of the pharmaceutical industry. Dixon RB J Clin Pharmacol; 1977; 17(11-12):691-6. PubMed ID: 925189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmaceutical drugs-the good and the not so good: together, we can make it better. Campbell AW Altern Ther Health Med; 2014; 20(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 24445351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Modification of a management information system software package to process drug reaction data. Cuddihy RV; Ring WS; Augustine NF Methods Inf Med; 1971 Jan; 10(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 5154765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A perspective on US drug reimportation. Choudhry NK; Detsky AS JAMA; 2005 Jan; 293(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 15657329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapeutic implications of the drug lag. Wardell WM Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1974 Jan; 15(1):73-96. PubMed ID: 4150345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US consumer group criticizes proposal to allow drug makers to challenge safety information. McCarthy M BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1514. PubMed ID: 25784706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The marketing of a drug. Wolfe SM Health Med; 1982; 1(2):31-2. PubMed ID: 10257087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Plans to reduce drug risks examined. Young D Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Aug; 64(15):1568, 1574, 1578. PubMed ID: 17646555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Program seeks to enlist physicians to flag questionable promotion of drugs. Mitka M JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 20606140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The HEALTH Act's FDA defense to punitive damages: a gift to drug makers or to the public? Levy E Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Mar; 74(4):2425-60. PubMed ID: 17115481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]