These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9272744)

  • 1. Auditory and tactile bone-conduction thresholds using three different oscillators.
    Dean M; Martin FN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Aug; 8(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 9272744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Air conduction, bone conduction, and soft tissue conduction audiograms in normal hearing and simulated hearing losses.
    Adelman C; Cohen A; Regev-Cohen A; Chordekar S; Fraenkel R; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 25597465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of bone oscillator coupling method, placement location, and occlusion on bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses in infants.
    Small SA; Hatton JL; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17204901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vibrotactile Thresholds on the Mastoid and Forehead Position of Deaf Patients Using Radioear B71 and B81.
    Fredén Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Fröhlich L; Rahne T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):714-723. PubMed ID: 28737551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occlusion effect: bone conduction speech audiometry using forehead and mastoid placement.
    Klodd DA; Edgerton BJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):522-9. PubMed ID: 921610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone Conduction Thresholds without Bone Vibrator Application Force.
    Geal-Dor M; Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):645-51. PubMed ID: 26218053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Thresholds Obtained With the Radioear B-71 and B-81 Bone-Conduction Transducers.
    Rao A; Altus B; Schroeder R; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1775-1778. PubMed ID: 33136651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of stimulation position on the sensitivity for bone conduction hearing aids without skin penetration.
    Dobrev I; Stenfelt S; Röösli C; Bolt L; Pfiffner F; Gerig R; Huber A; Sim JH
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):439-46. PubMed ID: 27139310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between CT findings and sensorineural hearing loss in chronic otitis media.
    Yoshida H; Miyamoto I; Takahashi H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Jun; 41(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 24387800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.
    Margolis RH; Glasberg BR; Creeke S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 20109081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which is mightier, the tuning fork or the bone oscillator?
    Behn A; Laszlo CA; Black D; Bryce GE
    J Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16076413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound pressure in the external auditory canal during bone-conduction testing.
    Fagelson M; Martin FN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Nov; 5(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 7858298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.
    Ishida IM; Cuthbert BP; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 21206364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone conduction threshold levels for different bone vibrator types.
    Frank T; Byrne DC; Richards LA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 3398482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inner Ear Excitation in Normal and Postmastoidectomy Participants by Fluid Stimulation in the Absence of Air- and Bone-Conduction Mechanisms.
    Ronen O; Geal-Dor M; Kaufmann-Yehezkely M; Perez R; Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):152-160. PubMed ID: 28240982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of bone conduction skull transmission by hearing thresholds and ear-canal sound pressure.
    Reinfeldt S; Stenfelt S; Håkansson B
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():19-28. PubMed ID: 23422311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.