These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9272746)

  • 21. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling.
    Robinson K; Gatehouse S
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 8698158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Loudness Perception of Pure Tones in Parkinson's Disease.
    Abur D; Lupiani AA; Hickox AE; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 61(6):1487-1496. PubMed ID: 29800039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2281-7. PubMed ID: 8730074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):317-35. PubMed ID: 9845030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing.
    Hawley ML; Sherlock LP; Formby C
    Semin Hear; 2017 Feb; 38(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 28286362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison between the electrically reproduced loudness and the original loudness of speech at high levels.
    Tschopp K; Beckenbauer T
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Aug; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 1756318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold.
    Al-Salim SC; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Stiegemann B; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 20588122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing AIDS.
    Liu H; Zhang H; Bentler RA; Han D; Zhang L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):606-15. PubMed ID: 22967735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.
    Christen R; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7444317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Test-retest reliability of a forced-choice procedure for determining most comfortable loudness level for speech.
    Wall LG; Gans RE
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 6724172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Magnitude estimation of loudness. I: Application to hearing aid selection.
    Geller D; Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 6717003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.