These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9273367)

  • 1. Effect of improved cementing techniques on the longevity of fixation in revision cemented femoral arthroplasties. Average 8.8-year follow-up period.
    Pierson JL; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Oct; 10(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 9273367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
    Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old. A multicenter evaluation of second-generation cementing technique.
    Strömberg CN; Herberts P
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):489-99. PubMed ID: 8872565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
    Katz RP; Callaghan JJ; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Mar; 79(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 9119866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques. An average 11.7-year follow-up evaluation.
    Estok DM; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):190-202. PubMed ID: 8119017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term results of use of a collared matte-finished femoral component fixed with second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-median follow-up study.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J; Berry DJ; Harmsen S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Sep; 84(9):1636-41. PubMed ID: 12208922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cemented revision for femoral osteolysis in cemented arthroplasties. Results in 29 hips after a mean 8.5-year follow-up.
    Pierson JL; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Jan; 76(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8300679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years.
    Haydon CM; Mehin R; Burnett S; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 15173290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic failure patterns of polished cemented stems.
    Jewett BA; Collis DK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():132-6. PubMed ID: 17312589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A ten-year follow-up study.
    Ballard WT; Callaghan JJ; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Jul; 76(7):959-64. PubMed ID: 8027123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total hip arthroplasty with cementing technique--five-year results.
    Kinov P; Bukarev D; Dimov V; Kazakov K; Tivchev P
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2007; 72(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 18078285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: integrity of the stem-cement interface.
    Meneghini RM; Feinberg JR; Capello WN
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 12728421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision of nonseptic, loose, cemented femoral components using modern cementing techniques.
    Rubash HE; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1988; 3(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 3183678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
    Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.