These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9273367)

  • 21. Revision total hip arthroplasty using third-generation cementing technique.
    Eisler T; Svensson O; Iyer V; Wejkner B; Schmalholz A; Larsson H; Elmstedt E
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):974-81. PubMed ID: 11112190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques.
    Katz RP; Callaghan JJ; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):178-83. PubMed ID: 7554628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cemented total hip arthroplasty following previous femoral osteotomy: an average 16-year follow-up study.
    Shinar AA; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Apr; 13(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 9590634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.
    Barrack RL; Mulroy RD; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 May; 74(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 1587883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimum 20-year follow-up results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
    Trumm BN; Callaghan JJ; George CA; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 23759117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Mulroy WF; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Mar; 78(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 8613438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acetabular and femoral fixation 15 years after cemented total hip surgery.
    Mulroy WF; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Apr; (337):118-28. PubMed ID: 9137183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a precoated offset stem. Four to nine-year results.
    Cannestra VP; Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1291-9. PubMed ID: 11005520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multicenter 10-year study of cemented revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old. A follow-up report.
    Strömberg CN; Herberts P
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Dec; 9(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 7699371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 540 hips.
    Lamberton TD; Kenny PJ; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1154-60. PubMed ID: 21570802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.
    Te Stroet MA; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; Van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Acta Orthop; 2016; 87(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 26569495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
    Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
    Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cementing technique affects the rate of femoral component loosening after high flexion total knee arthroplasty.
    Han HS; Lee MC
    Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 28974403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term results of aseptic cemented Charnley revisions.
    Garcia-Cimbrelo E; Munuera L; Diez-Vazquez V
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Apr; 10(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 7798092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.