These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9273372)

  • 1. Early failure of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Riebel GD; Werner FW; Ayers DC; Bromka J; Murray DG
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Oct; 10(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 9273372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unicompartmental porous coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty.
    Bernasek TL; Rand JA; Bryan RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):52-9. PubMed ID: 3180586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early failure of the porous coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Aids to diagnosis and revision.
    Knight JL; Atwater RD; Guo J
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 9021496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Hernigou P; Deschamps G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 14996875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Isolated Tibial Component Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series Evaluating Inflammatory Response versus Mechanical Failure.
    Yokhana SS; Bergum C; Ren W; Markel DC
    J Knee Surg; 2019 Jul; 32(7):659-666. PubMed ID: 29991080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation.
    Schai PA; Suh JT; Thornhill TS; Scott RD
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 9645515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral component failure in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case report.
    Argelo KD; Burger MA; Hoozemans MJ; Temmerman OP
    J Med Case Rep; 2014 Dec; 8():419. PubMed ID: 25495338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component.
    Saenz CL; McGrath MS; Marker DR; Seyler TM; Mont MA; Bonutti PM
    Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19553128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cementless AGC revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Otte KS; Larsen H; Jensen TT; Hansen EM; Rechnagel K
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9021502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Bruni D; Zaffagnini S; Iacono F; Bragonzoni L; Lo Presti M; Neri MP; Muccioli GM; Nitri M; Raspugli G; Marcacci M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Oct; 24(10):3175-3182. PubMed ID: 25416675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 35 cases.
    Böhm I; Landsiedl F
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Dec; 15(8):982-9. PubMed ID: 11112191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study.
    Lustig S; Paillot JL; Servien E; Henry J; Ait Si Selmi T; Neyret P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19251232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Rotaglide total knee arthroplasty. Prosthesis design and early results.
    Polyzoides AJ; Dendrinos GK; Tsakonas H
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 8792253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the twin peg design on femoral Interface temperature and maximum load to failure in cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Reiner T; Schwarze M; Panzram B; Klotz MC; Bitsch RG; Jaeger S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Jun; 55():23-27. PubMed ID: 29649670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Barrett WP; Scott RD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Dec; 69(9):1328-35. PubMed ID: 3440791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.
    DeFrancesco CJ; Canseco JA; Nelson CL; Israelite CL; Kamath AF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 May; 100(10):865-870. PubMed ID: 29762282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component.
    Kozinn SC; Marx C; Scott RD
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4 Suppl():S1-10. PubMed ID: 2584981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early failure of the porous-coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 5- to 9-year follow-up study.
    Skyrme AD; Mencia MM; Skinner PW
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Feb; 17(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11847620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low implant migration of the SIGMA
    Koppens D; Stilling M; Munk S; Dalsgaard J; Rytter S; Sørensen OG; Hansen TB
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 29147743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
    Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.