These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9273690)
1. [Alternatives to amalgam: taking the biophysical factors into consideration in the choice of restoration material. The annual congress of the Academy of Dental Materials (ADM) of 30 October to 2 November 1996 at Munich]. Scherrer S Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1997; 107(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 9273690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? Mackert JR; Wahl MJ J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 15468542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice of restorative material. Lynam G N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):77-8. PubMed ID: 15328835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. British Society of Prosthodontics Debate on the Implications of the Minamata Convention on Mercury to Dental Amalgam--Should our Patients be Worried? Austin R; Eliyas S; Burke FJ; Taylor P; Toner J; Briggs P Dent Update; 2016; 43(1):8-10, 12-4, 16-8. PubMed ID: 27024898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amalgam as a filling material for the older person--a personal opinion. Wilson J Gerodontology; 2014 Dec; 31(4):241-2. PubMed ID: 25427451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental materials--what goes where? Class I and II cavities. Burke FJ; Mackenzie L; Sands P Dent Update; 2013 May; 40(4):260-2, 264-6, 269-70 passim. PubMed ID: 23829006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Amalgam. XVII. Associations between views on dental amalgam and other variables]. Schuurs AH; Eijkman MA; Hoogstraten J Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Aug; 101(8):305-8. PubMed ID: 11831157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Amalgam. XIII. Criticism on dental amalgam: right or wrong?]. Admiraal WJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Mar; 101(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 11830957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis. Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making it stick. Bartlett D Dent Update; 2008 Apr; 35(3):209. PubMed ID: 18507229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proud to be a dinosaur. Clarke JS Dent Update; 2002; 29(6):306. PubMed ID: 12222023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material. Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In your dental practice, is dental amalgam still the restorative material of choice? J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Nov; 128(11):1502. PubMed ID: 9368435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]