217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9274077)
21. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses.
Wennerberg A; Hallgren C; Johansson C; Danelli S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Feb; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9590940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits.
Ungersböck A; Pohler O; Perren SM
Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7950879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of steroid-induced osteoporosis on osseointegration of titanium implants.
Fujimoto T; Niimi A; Sawai T; Ueda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9581403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3.
Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Lausmaa J
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Feb; 30(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9019491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants.
Johansson CB; Sennerby L; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1820312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histometric evaluation of bone around titanium implants with different surface treatments in rats exposed to cigarette smoke inhalation.
Correa MG; Gomes Campos ML; César-Neto JB; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 19302391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Park YS; Yi KY; Lee IS; Han CH; Jung YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
