These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem? Commentary on 'Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct'. Bird SJ Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Oct; 8(4):543-4. PubMed ID: 12501723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Misconduct in biomedical research]. de Jong JW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues. Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Plagiarism is dishonest and can easily be exposed]. Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Sep; 167(37):3479. PubMed ID: 16159453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Acta Dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica et Adriatica and scientific misconduct. Poljak M Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2009 Sep; 18(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 19784521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem? Berg AO Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical misconduct in publishing: the editors' perspective. Sarr MG; Warshaw AL World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1374-6. PubMed ID: 16773251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [My explanation concerning the situation regarding articles identified as plagiarism]. Jendryczko A Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(1-2):103-4. PubMed ID: 9644028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What do duplicate publications; self-plagiarism and the monotony of endless descriptive studies signify: publication pressures or simply a collective lack of imagination? O'Connor SJ Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 May; 19(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 20525059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn. Roehr B BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades. Handelsman J DNA Cell Biol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18279120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Publication of a review article in "Ginekologia Polska" identified as a plagiarism from the "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology]. Poreba R Ginekol Pol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):561. PubMed ID: 9867475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Two situations, which are difficult to differentiate from each other: plagiarism and duplication]. Kıraç FS Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2011 Aug; 11(5):459-60. PubMed ID: 21733788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]