87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9274613)
1. Cancer-registry data in Latvia.
Stengrevics A
Lancet; 1997 Aug; 350(9076):523. PubMed ID: 9274613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolution of cancer registration.
Rashbass J; Peake M
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2014 Nov; 23(6):757-9. PubMed ID: 25352464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternatives to a national system of population-based state cancer registries.
Thomas DB
Am J Public Health; 2002 Jul; 92(7):1064-6. PubMed ID: 12084679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Glaser et al. Increased training and funding for cancer surveillance research and argues that cancer registry data are underutilized.
Davis FG
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Jun; 17(5):747-8. PubMed ID: 16633922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Completeness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, Canada.
Wang FL; Gabos S; Sibbald B; Lowry RB
Chronic Dis Can; 2001; 22(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11525721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of completeness of case ascertainment of Austrian cancer incidence data using the flow method.
Hackl M; Waldhoer T
Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):889-93. PubMed ID: 23002230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases.
Innos K; Rahu M
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 11142605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Legal and practical issues regarding collection and disclosure of prognostic data in population-based cancer registries].
Tanaka H
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 53(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16881527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of rapid reporting of cancers in New Hampshire.
Celaya MO; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Armenti KR; Rees JR
J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 21462882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Managing clinical data: a cancer registries update.
Watkins S
J AHIMA; 1997; 68(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 10168978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of cancer registry medicaid status against enrollment files: implications for population-based studies of cancer outcomes.
Chan JK; Gomez SL; O'Malley CD; Perkins CI; Clarke CA
Med Care; 2006 Oct; 44(10):952-5. PubMed ID: 17001267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
Parkin DM; Bray F
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
Bray F; Parkin DM
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of cancer in Spain: consequences for cancer prevention and care.
Borras JM; Baselga J
Ann Oncol; 2010 May; 21 Suppl 3():iii1-2. PubMed ID: 20427352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Data quality at population-based cancer registries in Colombia.
Cendales R; Pardo C; Uribe C; López G; Yepez MC; Bravo LE
Biomedica; 2012; 32(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 23715229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An informatics-enabled approach for detection of new tumor registry cases.
Naser R; Roberts J; Salter T; Warner JL; Levy M
J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 24893184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and completeness of the New Zealand Cancer Registry for staging of invasive breast cancer.
Seneviratne S; Campbell I; Scott N; Shirley R; Peni T; Lawrenson R
Cancer Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 38(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 25037979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. South Dakota Cancer Registry South Dakota's cancer surveillance system.
South Dakota Department of Health
S D Med; 2010; Spec No():68. PubMed ID: 20401987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of data from the Norwegian Patient Register and the Cancer Registry of Norway.
Bakken IJ; Gystad SO; Christensen ØO; Huse UE; Larønningen S; Nygård J; Holmstrøm L; Johannesen TB; Møller B; Larsen IK
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Jun; 132(11):1336-40. PubMed ID: 22717858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
