These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9275505)
1. [A comparative morphometric and histologic study of five bone substitute materials]. Chen L; Klaes W; Assenmacher S Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Jul; 76(7):527-30. PubMed ID: 9275505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. Eggli PS; Müller W; Schenk RK Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):127-38. PubMed ID: 2838207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. Hing KA; Best SM; Tanner KE; Bonfield W; Revell PA J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jan; 68(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 14661264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-directed bone regeneration in the dog mandible: a comparison between biphasic calcium phosphate and natural bone mineral. Jafarian M; Eslaminejad MB; Khojasteh A; Mashhadi Abbas F; Dehghan MM; Hassanizadeh R; Houshmand B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):e14-24. PubMed ID: 18442730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in diaphyseal defects: a histometric study. Holmes RE; Bucholz RW; Mooney V J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 3029358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of enhancement of bone ingrowth into hydroxyapatite ceramics with highly and poorly interconnected pores by electrical polarization. Wang W; Itoh S; Tanaka Y; Nagai A; Yamashita K Acta Biomater; 2009 Oct; 5(8):3132-40. PubMed ID: 19426842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Jensen SS; Aaboe M; Pinholt EM; Hjørting-Hansen E; Melsen F; Ruyter IE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 8820123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone ingrowth into two porous ceramics with different pore sizes: an experimental study. Galois L; Mainard D Acta Orthop Belg; 2004 Dec; 70(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 15669463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental study of the effect of new bone formation on new type artificial bone composed of bioactive ceramics]. Zhu M; Zeng Y; Sun T; Peng Q Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 19(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 15828468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteogenesis after bone and bone marrow transplantation. The ability of ceramic materials to sustain osteogenesis from transplanted bone marrow cells: preliminary studies. Nade S; Armstrong L; McCartney E; Baggaley B Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Dec; (181):255-63. PubMed ID: 6315286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants. Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cellular culture of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on porous calcium-phosphate bone substitutes]. Chouteau J; Bignon A; Chavassieux P; Chevalier J; Melin M; Fantozzi G; Boivin G; Hartmann D; Carret JP Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 12610435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. Jones AC; Arns CH; Sheppard AP; Hutmacher DW; Milthorpe BK; Knackstedt MA Biomaterials; 2007 May; 28(15):2491-504. PubMed ID: 17335896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes. Habibovic P; Kruyt MC; Juhl MV; Clyens S; Martinetti R; Dolcini L; Theilgaard N; van Blitterswijk CA J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1363-70. PubMed ID: 18404698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone formation in the presence of phagocytosable hydroxyapatite particles. Wang JS; Goodman S; Aspenberg P Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jul; (304):272-9. PubMed ID: 8020228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparison study on autologous periosteum-wrapped tendon and spongiosa homogenate as a substitute for lunate]. Meng Z; Tian L; Shao X Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jul; 18(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 15323435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Repair of bone defect with compound of coralline hydroxyapatite porous, fibrin sealant and Staphylococcus aureus injection]. Wei ZC; Cai DZ; Zhang JF Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 17(5):363-6. PubMed ID: 14551930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]