238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9276098)
1. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.
Beattie RC; Barr T; Roup C
Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Cates WB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
Beattie RC
J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Feb; 54(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 2915523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
Wilson RH; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 16866003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing.
Pekkarinen E; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 2336538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words.
Beattie RC; Raffin MJ
J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
Wilson RH; Oyler AL
Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
