These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9276101)

  • 1. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study.
    Meyer SE; Jardine CA; Deverson W
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 9276101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 1000 Hz-, 226 Hz-probe tone tympanometry and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the function of middle ear in infants.
    Yang K; Liu Z
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110135. PubMed ID: 32544643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of middle ear function in young children: clinical guidelines for the use of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry.
    Alaerts J; Luts H; Wouters J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 17948353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tympanometry in infants with middle ear effusion having been identified using spiral computerized tomography.
    Zhiqi L; Kun Y; Zhiwu H
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20015724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of 1000 Hz tympanometry in infants: tympanometric trace classification and choice of probe tone in relation to age.
    Hoffmann A; Deuster D; Rosslau K; Knief A; Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A; Schmidt CM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 23726955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of tympanometry with 226 Hz and 1000 Hz probe tones in children with Down syndrome.
    Lewis MP; Bradford Bell E; Evans AK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1492-5. PubMed ID: 21944057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative analysis of 226 Hz and 1 000 Hz probe tone tympanometry in infants].
    Xu J; Chen S; Zheng Z; Shao X; Su R; Shen A; Shi B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(7):371-5. PubMed ID: 23833991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of tympanometry results for probe tones of 226 Hz and 1000 Hz in newborns.
    Pilka E; Kochanek K; Jedrzejczak WW; Saczek A; Skarzynski H; Niedzielski A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 147():110804. PubMed ID: 34175657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maturation of the middle and external ears: acoustic power-based responses and reflectance tympanometry.
    Keefe DH; Levi E
    Ear Hear; 1996 Oct; 17(5):361-73. PubMed ID: 8909884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normative multifrequency tympanometry in infants and toddlers.
    Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(7):470-80. PubMed ID: 16927511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of 1000-Hz probe tone in tympanometry according to age in Korean infants.
    Park M; Han KH; Jung H; Kim MH; Chang HK; Kim SH; Park MK; Lee JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jan; 79(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 25468461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of consecutive trials and test-retest reliability of 1000-Hz tympanometry in adults.
    Carazo CD; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 25262790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison between 226 Hz probe tone tympanometry and spiral CT test in infants].
    Liu Z; Liu L; Yang K
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):887-9. PubMed ID: 23285954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multifrequency tympanometry: effects of ear canal volume compensation on middle ear resonance.
    Hanks WD; Mortensen BA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Feb; 8(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 9046069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-Retest Reliability of Multicomponent Tympanometry at 226-, 678-, and 1000-Hz Probe Tones Over 10 Sessions.
    Singh NK; Baral TL
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):516-523. PubMed ID: 31461338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Investigation of tympanogram in newborns with 226 hz and 1000 hz probe tones].
    Li M; Zheng Y; Li G; Wang K
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1009-13. PubMed ID: 23379110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of trace patterns of 226- and 1000-Hz tympanometry in healthy neonates.
    Son EJ; Park YA; Kim JH; Hong SA; Lim HY; Choi JY; Lee WS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Oct; 39(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 22055507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental changes in multifrequency tympanograms.
    Holte L; Margolis RH; Cavanaugh RM
    Audiology; 1991; 30(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 2059166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Impedance audiometry with 3-probe frequency].
    Lu J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1991; 26(5):281-3, 317. PubMed ID: 1811679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of conductive hearing loss in young infants using tympanometry and wideband reflectance.
    Prieve BA; Vander Werff KR; Preston JL; Georgantas L
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 23263407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.