These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9277280)
1. [Evaluating the performance appraisal in daily nursing practice]. Chaves EB; Magalhães AM Rev Gaucha Enferm; 1996 Jul; 17(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 9277280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A progressive management tool. Olson HE Medsurg Nurs; 1996 Jun; 5(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 8716589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of nursing competence pre- and postimplementing clinical ladder system. Hsu N; Chen BT; Lee LL; Chen CH; Lai CF J Clin Nurs; 2005 Feb; 14(2):264-5. PubMed ID: 15669936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Nurses' perception of management]. Sette VM; Silva A; Da Costa MC; Echer IC Rev Gaucha Enferm; 1997 Jan; 18(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 9536794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crossing our quality chasm: heeding the case for graduate preparation of nurse managers and leaders. Murphy LS; Scott ES; Pawlak R J Nurs Adm; 2013 Sep; 43(9):431-3. PubMed ID: 23979031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers. Tayler CM Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scope and standards for nurse administrators. American Nurses Association. ANA Publ; 1996 Jan; (NS-35 5M):i-iv, 1-27. PubMed ID: 8715037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal. Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The graduate, the head nurse and the nursing supervisor. A descriptive study of the competence of recent graduates]. Brundu T; Pinna R; Nonnis M; Pedditzi ML Prof Inferm; 2015; 68(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 25837615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing new graduate nurse performance. Berkow S; Virkstis K; Stewart J; Conway L J Nurs Adm; 2008 Nov; 38(11):468-74. PubMed ID: 18997551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of competence in clinical practice: a phenomenological approach. Girot EA J Adv Nurs; 1993 Jan; 18(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 8429155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ensuring the integrity of appraisal systems. Shaw S Nurs N Z; 2000 Feb; 6(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 11040689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of charge nurses]. Nowomińska A Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Grading, evaluation, what do they mean?]. Malhomme ML Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 2000; (35):38-40. PubMed ID: 11111727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Staff nurses transform peer review. Shaffer C; Ganger M; Glover C J Nurs Adm; 2011 May; 41(5):201-3. PubMed ID: 21519205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Advanced nursing practice: experience, education and something else. Lakeman R Nurs Prax N Z; 1999 Jul; 14(2):4-12. PubMed ID: 11221313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the utilization of post-basic nursing graduates of the University of Zululand by their supervisors in the health services and educational institutions in Kwazulu-Natal. Kubheka BA; Nzimande PN Curationis; 2006 Nov; 29(4):95-106. PubMed ID: 17310749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization management advancement system: a career ladder for nonclinical nursing. Brasel N; Connolly KF; Evans JE; Karlik BA; Richards A; A'Hearn A J Healthc Qual; 1995; 17(5):6-10; quiz 10, 17, 48. PubMed ID: 10144987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurses' perceptions of continuing professional development. Hughes E Nurs Stand; 2005 Jul 6-12; 19(43):41-9. PubMed ID: 16021890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]