These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9277633)

  • 1. A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel environmental sounds.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Aug; 103(2):304-18. PubMed ID: 9277633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis.
    Debener S; Makeig S; Delorme A; Engel AK
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 15722203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The old switcheroo: when target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1359-67. PubMed ID: 15134703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Feb; 36(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 9500881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The brain's orienting response: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.
    Friedman D; Goldman R; Stern Y; Brown TR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1144-54. PubMed ID: 18465750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ERP developmental study of repetition priming by auditory novel stimuli.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D; Rothstein M
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Nov; 33(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 8961790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball.
    Smith ME; Halgren E; Sokolik M; Baudena P; Musolino A; Liegeois-Chauvel C; Chauvel P
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Sep; 76(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 1697255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3.
    Gaeta H; Friedman D; Hunt G
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 12820861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced brain responses to novel sounds in depression: P3 findings in a novelty oddball task.
    Bruder GE; Kroppmann CJ; Kayser J; Stewart JW; McGrath PJ; Tenke CE
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Dec; 170(2-3):218-23. PubMed ID: 19900720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intracranial identification of an electric frontal-cortex response to auditory stimulus change: a case study.
    Liasis A; Towell A; Alho K; Boyd S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11275484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of aging on the novelty P3 during attend and ignore oddball tasks.
    Friedman D; Kazmerski VA; Cycowicz YM
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Sep; 35(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 9715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental trends of auditory novelty oddball P3 while accounting for N2 in 7- to 25-year-olds.
    Mingils SM; Davies PL; Stephens JA; Gavin WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Apr; 60(4):e14214. PubMed ID: 36350088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potentials in a self-paced novelty oddball task.
    Nittono H; Ullsperger P
    Neuroreport; 2000 Jun; 11(9):1861-4. PubMed ID: 10884033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention.
    Debener S; Kranczioch C; Herrmann CS; Engel AK
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Oct; 46(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 12374648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential.
    Yago E; Escera C; Alho K; Giard MH; Serra-Grabulosa JM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 May; 16(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12706218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of intention to learn novel, environmental sounds on the novelty P3 and old/new recognition memory.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Biol Psychol; 1999 May; 50(1):35-60. PubMed ID: 10378438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The brain's orienting response (novelty P3) in patients with unilateral temporal lobe resections.
    Friedman D; Nessler D; Kulik J; Hamberger M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3474-83. PubMed ID: 21906606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related brain potentials in response to novel sounds in dementia.
    Yamaguchi S; Tsuchiya H; Yamagata S; Toyoda G; Kobayashi S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 111(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 10680554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):348-68. PubMed ID: 16356767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.