These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Impact of cesarean section in a private health service in Brazil: indications and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. Almeida MA; Araujo Júnior E; Camano L; Peixoto AB; Martins WP; Mattar R Ceska Gynekol; 2018; 83(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 29510632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal laceration during caesarean section and its medico-legal sequelae. Esposito C; Escolino M; Paternoster M; Buccelli C; Graziano V; Falco M; Alicchio F; Cerulo M; Settimi A; Savanelli A Med Sci Law; 2015 Apr; 55(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 24644228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal laceration injury during cesarean section and its long-term sequelae: a case report. Gajjar K; Spencer C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 201(4):e5-7. PubMed ID: 19788961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cesarean section decrease the incidence of major birth trauma? Puza S; Roth N; Macones GA; Mennuti MT; Morgan MA J Perinatol; 1998; 18(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 9527937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anal sphincter laceration at vaginal delivery: is this event coded accurately? Brubaker L; Bradley CS; Handa VL; Richter HE; Visco A; Brown MB; Weber AM Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 17470596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Meister MR; Cahill AG; Conner SN; Woolfolk CL; Lowder JL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):310.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26902989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery. Smid MC; Vladutiu CJ; Dotters-Katz SK; Boggess KA; Manuck TA; Stamilio DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):614.e1-614.e7. PubMed ID: 28209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Bérard J; Dufour P; Vinatier D; Subtil D; Vanderstichèle S; Monnier JC; Puech F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Mar; 77(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9550201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome? Weeks JW; Pitman T; Spinnato JA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1215-9. PubMed ID: 7485323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cesarean section for the second twin: a population-based study of occurrence and outcome. Engelbrechtsen L; Nielsen EH; Perin T; Oldenburg A; Tabor A; Skibsted L; Birth; 2013 Mar; 40(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 24635419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes? Fonseca A; Silva R; Rato I; Neves AR; Peixoto C; Ferraz Z; Ramalho I; Carocha A; Félix N; Valdoleiros S; Galvão A; Gonçalves D; Curado J; Palma MJ; Antunes IL; Clode N; Graça LM Acta Med Port; 2017 Jun; 30(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 28898615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section. Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]