120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9278369)
1. Computed radiography angiography using storage phosphor imaging plates: eight year's experience.
Kudo S; Kato A; Uchino A; Matsuo Y; Mizuguchi M; Fukahori T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu T
Radiat Med; 1997; 15(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 9278369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lower extremity: nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography.
Therasse E; Soulez G; Roy P; Gauvin A; Oliva VL; Carrier R; Robillard P
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 9609892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Timely Antecedent CT or MRI Can Help Predict Hemorrhage Site of Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer, With Digital Subtraction Angiography Used as the Reference Standard.
Ku YK; Wong YC; Fu CJ; Tseng HJ; Wang LJ; Wang CJ; Chin SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 26959959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The correction for motion and visualization of subtraction angiographic data from the spiral CT].
Beier J; Richter CS; Fleck E; Felix R
Rofo; 1995 Jan; 162(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 7841403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography].
Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with extra-large fields using a computed radiography system in evaluating peripheral vascular disease.
Hasuo K; Mizushima A; Mihara F; Hashiguchi N; Murayama S; Uchino A; Matsumoto S; Gibo M; Torii Y; Komori K; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1996; 14(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 8988500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of digital subtraction and film-screen angiography of the lower limb: prospective study in 50 patients.
Smith TP; Cragg AH; Berbaum KS; Nakagawa N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 1729803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The use of magnetic resonance contrast agents for selective digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography with contrast enhancement].
Kokov LS; Karmazanovskiĭ GG; Likharev AY; Shimanovskiĭ NL
Angiol Sosud Khir; 2006; 12(4):51-8. PubMed ID: 17679958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital imaging of the chest.
Fraser RG; Sanders C; Barnes GT; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Doi K; Templeton AW; Cox GG; Dwyer SJ; Merritt CR
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 2649913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frameless neuronavigation based only on 3D digital subtraction angiography using surface-based facial registration.
Stidd DA; Wewel J; Ghods AJ; Munich S; Serici A; Keigher KM; Theessen H; Moftakhar R; Lopes DK
J Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 121(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 25036204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital subtraction angiography for leg venography.
Kudo S; Kishikawa T; Kuroiwa T; Matsumoto S; Kato A; Matsuo Y; Mizuguchi M
Radiat Med; 1992; 10(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1584999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Höpfner M; Schwarzenberg H; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Jan; 166(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9072101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified magnetic resonance angiography of the liver using sensitivity encoding in comparison with digital subtraction angiography and CT arterial portography.
Yan SX; Liang TB; Fujii M; Kawamitsu H; Sugimura K; Zheng SS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 May; 4(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 15908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combination of noninvasive neurovascular imaging modalities in stroke patients: patterns of use and impact on need for digital subtraction angiography.
Hassan AE; Rostambeigi N; Chaudhry SA; Khan AA; Zacharatos H; Khatri R; Uzun G; Qureshi AI
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 22(7):e53-8. PubMed ID: 22578916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
