140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9278695)
1. Ultrasound characteristics of connective tissue around porous hydroxyapatite hypodermic implants in rats.
Mery CC; Grunert G; Plaza JC; Pizzi T
Biol Res; 1996; 29(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 9278695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of porous and dense hydroxyapatite implantation on periodontal tissue regeneration in monkeys.
Lin CJ; Ishikawa I
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1989 Mar; 36(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2702709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biocompatibility of steroid-HA delivery system using adult castrated rams as a model.
Benghuzzi H; England B
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():275-80. PubMed ID: 11347402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multinucleated giant cells elicited around hydroxyapatite particles implanted in craniotomy defects are not osteoclasts.
Dersot JM; Colombier ML; Lafont J; Baroukh B; Septier D; Saffar JL
Anat Rec; 1995 Jun; 242(2):166-76. PubMed ID: 7668401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 12 month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite.
Itokawa H; Hiraide T; Moriya M; Fujimoto M; Nagashima G; Suzuki R; Fujimoto T
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(33):4922-7. PubMed ID: 17707904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Morphologic studies of the reaction of the subcutaneous connective tissue in rats to implantation of porous ceramics].
Kotz J; Bieniek J; Bieniek A
Polim Med; 1989; 19(3-4):119-25. PubMed ID: 2641401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No effect of hydroxyapatite particles in phagocytosable sizes on implant fixation: an experimental study in dogs.
Rahbek O; Kold S; Bendix K; Overgaard S; Soballe K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 May; 73(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 15754330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometric analysis of the interface between bone and titanium implants.
Eriksson C; Malmberg P; Nygren H
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2008 Apr; 22(7):943-9. PubMed ID: 18306212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of hydroxyapatite particulate debris on the production of cytokines and proteases in human fibroblasts.
Ninomiya JT; Struve JA; Stelloh CT; Toth JM; Crosby KE
J Orthop Res; 2001 Jul; 19(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 11518271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reactions of connective tissue to amalgam, intermediate restorative material, mineral trioxide aggregate, and mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with chlorhexidine.
Sumer M; Muglali M; Bodrumlu E; Guvenc T
J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1094-6. PubMed ID: 17055915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of interconnecting porous structure of hydroxyapatite ceramics on interface between grafted tendon and ceramics.
Omae H; Mochizuki Y; Yokoya S; Adachi N; Ochi M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Nov; 79(2):329-37. PubMed ID: 16817208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
Zywicka B
Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrastructural comparison of hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications.
Porter AE; Best SM; Bonfield W
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jan; 68(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 14661258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of in vivo properties of hydroxyapatite-polyhydroxybutyrate composites assessed for bone substitution.
Carlo EC; Borges AP; Del Carlo RJ; Martinez MM; Oliveira PM; Morato GO; Eleotério RB; Reis Júnior MS
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 19461325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytological evaluation of the tissue-implant reaction associated with S/C and I/P implantation of ALCAP and HA bioceramics in vivo.
Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Puckett A
Pathol Res Pract; 2001; 197(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11209814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One year histopathological evaluation of fibrous tissue surrounding TCPL implants using adult rats as a model.
Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Bajpai P; Puckett A; Tucci M; Cason Z; England B
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():233-9. PubMed ID: 9731364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
