These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9280231)

  • 21. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 8421741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Equalization radiography: LEONARD-GIL, AMBER.
    Natale L; Gregorio FD; Sallustio G; Belli P
    Rays; 1992; 17(3):368-78. PubMed ID: 1480783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chest radiographs boast superior anatomic detail.
    Betz BW; Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1990 Nov; 12(11):215-8. PubMed ID: 10171142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL; Herbig W
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The development and most recent status of thoracic diagnosis with reference to the low-dose image intensifier].
    Gremer E
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989; 51(8-9):510-1. PubMed ID: 2531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Digital radiography of the thorax].
    Frija J; de Kerviler E; Zagdanski AM; Feger C; Attal P; Laval-Jeantet M
    J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 78(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 9113146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
    Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Radiological study of the thorax. Evaluation of efficacy-efficiency of a large-field image intensifier in mass screening].
    Bonetti MG; Gregori S; Lamarche V; Radice E; Spiga G; Maggi S; Giorgini P; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989 Sep; 78(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2798965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Technical advances in chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.