323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9280734)
21. [Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix at the Dakar Cancer Institute].
Dem A; Dieng MM; Traoré B; Gaye M; Diop M; Touré P
Sante; 2008; 18(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 18684688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Age and prognosis: analysis of their association in 93 cases of cervical cancer].
Zhou RL; Liu GB
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Sep; 24(9):1066-7. PubMed ID: 15447867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Cervical cancer. Epidemiological profile in 1,217 patients. Seguro popular].
Torres Lobatón A; Bustamante Iglesias JI; Torres Rojo A; Oliva Posada JC; Morales Palomares MA; Román Bassaure E
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2013 Feb; 81(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 23596728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Carcinoma of cervix at Ramathibodi Hospital from cancer registry 1978-1982.
Srisupundit S; Tangtrakul S; Kraiphibul P; Pochanukul L
J Med Assoc Thai; 1984 Oct; 67 Suppl 2():68-72. PubMed ID: 6512464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A clinicopathologic study of 44 cases.
Czernobilsky B; Rotenstreich L; Lancet M
Isr J Med Sci; 1972 Dec; 8(12):1944-52. PubMed ID: 4655310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prevalence and outcome of dysplasia of cervix in self-selected population of Thailand.
Srivannaboon S; Bhamarapravati N
J Med Assoc Thai; 1974 Jul; 57(7):351-6. PubMed ID: 4853761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on incidence and stage distribution of invasive cases.
Gad C
Dan Med Bull; 1976 May; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 949913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Epidemiologic characteristics in patients with epithelial dysplasi, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The population screening for cervical carcinoma in Maribo amt (county) 1967-1969.
Berget A
Dan Med Bull; 1975 Sep; 22(6):252-9. PubMed ID: 1175395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of risk factors in CA CX at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad (Marathwada).
Rao BN; Shewalkar BK
Indian J Cancer; 2000; 37(2-3):74-8. PubMed ID: 11876613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Evidence for regression of carcinoma-in-situ and for a second form of invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut 1935-73].
Meigs JW; Laskey PW; Flannery JT
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jul; 36(7):554-69. PubMed ID: 955362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [The incidence of the cancer of cervix and corpus uteri in the Virovitica region from 1965 to 1979 (author's transl)].
Pupek V; Glumicić P; Marina N; Cosić J; Zerjal I; Hasan R
Lijec Vjesn; 1980 Dec; 102(12):734-7. PubMed ID: 7266236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening.
Bergström R; Sparén P; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10487628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Appropriate frequency of mass-screening for uterine cervical cancer.
Iwanari O
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Oct; 39(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 3429977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Potential role of human papillomavirus in the development of subsequent primary in situ and invasive cancers among cervical cancer survivors.
Balamurugan A; Ahmed F; Saraiya M; Kosary C; Schwenn M; Cokkinides V; Flowers L; Pollack LA
Cancer; 2008 Nov; 113(10 Suppl):2919-25. PubMed ID: 18980275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971].
Gerber E; Vajda D
Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical cancer screening: précis and critique of a recent Canadian report.
Chiavetta J; Leader SR
Med J Aust; 1977 Jan 1-8; 1(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 840075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Selected clinical characteristics of Israeli Jewish women with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a population-based study.
Kogan L; Menczer J; Shejter E; Liphshitz I; Barchana M
Isr Med Assoc J; 2011 Feb; 13(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 21443032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Characteristics of uterine cancer detected by mass screening].
Igarashi T; Konno R; Sato S; Yajima A
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1519-26. PubMed ID: 9725043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
Miller AB
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Malignant mullerian mixed tumors of the uterine cervix: a report of nine cases of a neoplasm with morphology often different from its counterpart in the corpus.
Clement PB; Zubovits JT; Young RH; Scully RE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1998 Jul; 17(3):211-22. PubMed ID: 9656116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
