These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 928090)

  • 1. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appraisal schemes could do better.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1983 Oct; 93(4870):1288-9. PubMed ID: 10263806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nurse appraisal in practice.
    Anderson G; Barnett J
    Health Serv J; 1986 Oct; 96(5023):1420-1. PubMed ID: 10279314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
    Ransom E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On stage for a good performance review.
    Flanagan H
    Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1988 Mar; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10286387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Individual performance review". What is it? How does it affect me?
    Osborn A
    AMRO; 1988 Aug; 29(2):23-6. PubMed ID: 10293121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field worker's forum.
    Ross WF
    Lepr Rev; 1980 Mar; 51(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7464421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staff appraisal: trying to do better.
    Walton M
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 10-16; 81(28):30-1. PubMed ID: 3848848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency in job descriptions, the interview process, and employee evaluations.
    Lewis J
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Apr; 39(4):643-4. PubMed ID: 7081243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating IPR.
    Hurst K
    Nurs Times; 1989 Sep 13-19; 85(37):60. PubMed ID: 2813118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighting performance made our merit raises fairer.
    Alcala A; Evans M; Flynn K; Hardin M; McElhiney B; Shaw P; Westfall J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1990 Jun; 22(6):35-7, 40. PubMed ID: 10106706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring down: PRP pitfalls.
    Kline R
    Health Visit; 1993 Jun; 66(6):222. PubMed ID: 8344838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face up to doing the dreaded appraisals.
    Gulati S
    Nurs Times; 2012 Mar 13-19; 108(11):33. PubMed ID: 22536716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What happens when a complaint is received about a nurse's practice?
    Mackay H
    Nurs BC; 2001 Jun; 33(3):15-8. PubMed ID: 12152566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding job evaluation.
    Newey M
    Nurs Times; 1978 Jan; 74(4):132-4. PubMed ID: 622341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.