185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9280929)
21. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of respiratory-triggered T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging versus breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging: distinguishing benign from malignant liver lesions in patients with colorectal cancer.
Coenegrachts K; ter Beek L; Haspeslagh M; Bipat S; Stoker J; Rigauts H
JBR-BTR; 2009; 92(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 19803097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI for intracranial tumors in comparison with post-contrast T1W spin-echo MRI.
Zhou ZR; Shen TZ; Chen XR; Peng WJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Mar; 119(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 16584644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequences with selective fat suppression (SPIR) compared with chemical shift sequences in MRI for differentiation of adrenal tumors. Spectral Presaturation by Inversion Recovery].
Kreft B; Sommer T; Vahlensieck M; Seewald S; Vetter H; Schild H
Rofo; 1995 Apr; 162(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 7749086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. MRI of soft-tissue tumors: fast STIR sequence as substitute for T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequence.
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Matsunaga N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1607-14. PubMed ID: 19933655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-enhanced multi-shot echo-planar FLAIR in the depiction of metastatic tumors of the brain: comparison with contrast-enhanced spin-echo T1-weighted imaging.
Tomura N; Narita K; Takahashi S; Otani T; Sakuma I; Yasuda K; Nishii T; Watarai J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 17957522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Usefulness of selective partial inversion recover (SPIR) sequences in optic nerve diseases].
Pierallini A; Piattella MC; Polli NS; Bonamini M; Angeloni U; David V; Bozzao L
Radiol Med; 1999 Apr; 97(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 10414255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images.
Arndt WF; Truax AL; Barnett FM; Simmons GE; Brown DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8571859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, before and after successful therapy with infliximab: evaluation of a new scoring system.
Braun J; Baraliakos X; Golder W; Brandt J; Rudwaleit M; Listing J; Bollow M; Sieper J; Van Der Heijde D
Arthritis Rheum; 2003 Apr; 48(4):1126-36. PubMed ID: 12687557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative evaluation of magnetization transfer contrast and fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences in brain tuberculoma.
Saxena S; Prakash M; Kumar S; Gupta RK
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jul; 60(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 15978890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Hepatic and hepatocarcinoma magnetic resonance: comparison of the results obtained with paramagnetic (gadolinium) and superparamagnetic (iron oxide particles) contrast media].
Castoldi MC; Fauda V; Scaramuzza D; Vergnaghi D
Radiol Med; 2000 Sep; 100(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 11148882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Quantitative evaluation of the suitability of magnetic resonance sequences for the detection of spinal bone marrow metastases of solid tumors].
Layer G; Sommer T; Busch M; Schüller H; Schild HH
Rofo; 1998 Jan; 168(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 9501930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 tesla MRI.
Wohlgemuth WA; Roemer FW; Bohndorf K
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Jun; 31(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 12073118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Magnetic resonance in the identification and assessment of extent and severity of bone contusion damage: comparison of several types of imaging (SE/T1, GE/T2 and SE/T1) with fat suppression].
Cappabianca S; Iscaro FM; Sirignano C; Napoli E; Del Vecchio W
Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 10051866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences.
Madsen KB; Egund N; Jurik AG
J Rheumatol; 2010 Feb; 37(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 20032094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparison of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance with fast sequences with and without paramagnetic contrast media in the assessment of liver metastasis: qualitative and quantitative analysis].
Maccioni F; Broglia L; Rossi P
Radiol Med; 1997 Jun; 93(6):708-14. PubMed ID: 9411518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Noncontrast MR imaging and MR arthrography of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow: prospective evaluation of two-dimensional pulse sequences for detection of complete tears.
Carrino JA; Morrison WB; Zou KH; Steffen RT; Snearly WN; Murray PM
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(11):625-32. PubMed ID: 11810154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Magnetic resonance in the study of suprarenal neoplasms. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of signal intensity].
Maurea S; Caracò C; Castelli L; Filice S; Alfano B; Ruffolo F; Ziviello M; Salvatore M
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 9638166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging.
Schmid MR; Hodler J; Vienne P; Binkert CA; Zanetti M
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):463-9. PubMed ID: 12147843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
