These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9281831)

  • 1. The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.
    Rosen VM; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1997 Sep; 126(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 9281831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.
    Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Dec; 123(4):354-73. PubMed ID: 7996121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency.
    Hirshorn EA; Thompson-Schill SL
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2547-57. PubMed ID: 16725162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word retrieval to letter and semantic cues: a double dissociation in normal subjects using interference tasks.
    Martin A; Wiggs CL; Lalonde F; Mack C
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Dec; 32(12):1487-94. PubMed ID: 7885578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions.
    Baldo JV; Shimamura AP
    Neuropsychology; 1998 Apr; 12(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 9556772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.
    Schelble JL; Therriault DJ; Miller MD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):218-30. PubMed ID: 22006581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal intrusions precede memory decline in adults with Down syndrome.
    Kittler P; Krinsky-McHale SJ; Devenny DA
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jan; 50(Pt 1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16316425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Spillers GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 20382920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jun; 71():1-26. PubMed ID: 24531497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity and retrieval from long-term memory: the role of controlled search.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 23055120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Person-based organisation in working memory.
    Ishiguro S; Saito S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 30056797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age differences in encoding specificity.
    Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.