These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9281872)

  • 1. Accuracy of routinely collected clinical data on acute medical admissions to one hospital.
    Hobbs FD; Parle JV; Kenkre JE
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Jul; 47(420):439-40. PubMed ID: 9281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel method for the assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic codes in general surgery.
    Gibson N; Bridgman SA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Jul; 80(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 9771235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How well do family practitioner committee and general practice records agree? Experience in a semi-rural practice.
    Voss SN; Thomas HF
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jul; 41(348):293-4. PubMed ID: 1747269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Medical care research based on family doctor routine data--are interface-communicated treatment data feasible?].
    Hummers-Pradier E; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Scheidt-Nave C; Scheer N; Fischer T; Niebling W; Kochen MM
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003 Feb; 65(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 12632320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creating a general practice national minimum data set: present possibility or future plan?
    Tilyard MW; Munro N; Walker SA; Dovey SM
    N Z Med J; 1998 Aug; 111(1072):317-8, 320. PubMed ID: 9765630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving data collection.
    Daskalakis TG
    NAHAM Manage J; 1992; 17(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 10117165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The emerging role of the health information management professional in data quality and analysis of an electronic medical record system.
    Watzlaf VJ; Saul M
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Nov; 15(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10138528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can general practitioner referral letters for acute medical admissions be improved?
    Mead GE; Cunnington AL; Faulkner S; Russell KJ; Ford MJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1999 Jul; 57(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 12811886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors explaining the use of psychiatric services by general practices.
    Melzer D; Watters L; Paykel E; Singh K; Gormley N
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Nov; 49(448):887-91. PubMed ID: 10818654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structured data entry of clinical information for documentation and data collection.
    Cheung NT; Fung V; Chow YY; Tung Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):609-13. PubMed ID: 11604809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and completeness of Scottish mental hospital in-patient data.
    McGonigal G; McQuade C; Thomas B
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1992 Jul; 50(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 1526775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Childhood asthma surveillance using computerized billing records: a pilot study.
    Morris RD; Naumova EN; Goldring J; Hersch M; Munasinghe RL; Anderson H
    Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 10822479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of individual and population smoking data from a postal survey and general practice records.
    Wilson A; Manku-Scott T; Shepherd D; Jones B
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Jun; 50(455):465-8. PubMed ID: 10962784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethnicity recording in general practice computer systems.
    Kumarapeli P; Stepaniuk R; de Lusignan S; Williams R; Rowlands G
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16840765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two quality improvement teams: strategies and scores.
    Loncar RV; Birnbaum CL
    Manag Care Q; 1993; 1(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10130361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of computerised medical records usage among general practitioners in Australia and Sweden.
    Bomba D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():55-9. PubMed ID: 10384419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing customer service in the admitting process.
    Somers M
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Sep; 48(9):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10146066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [IT systems for clinical databases--status and perspectives].
    Vingtoft S; Jensen LP; Madsen I; Nielsen PH; Kverneland A; Kjaergaard J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4398-405. PubMed ID: 12362730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.