These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9282550)

  • 1. Combined intrusion and retraction generated by cantilevers with helical coils.
    Melsen B; Konstantellos V; Lagoudakis M; Planert J
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997; 58(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 9282550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force systems developed by six different cantilever configurations.
    Dalstra M; Melsen B
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10534973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3-D experimental identification of force systems from orthodontic loops activated for first order corrections.
    Menghi C; Planert J; Melsen B
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 10022185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.
    Papageorgiou SN; Keilig L; Hasan I; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 26174769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous arch wire closing loop design, optimization, and verification. Part II.
    Siatkowski RE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 9387834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Top Wire Appliance bracket: tooth movement and friction].
    Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2002 Dec; 73(4):415-27. PubMed ID: 12528246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stiffness-deflection behavior of selected orthodontic wires.
    Oltjen JM; Duncanson MG; Ghosh J; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 9188965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
    Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frictional forces in fixed appliances.
    Tidy DC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Sep; 96(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 2773871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.
    Drescher D; Bourauel C; Schumacher HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Nov; 96(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 2816839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire.
    Garner LD; Allai WW; Moore BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Sep; 90(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 3463195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical investigation of the hybrid retraction spring.
    Sander FG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(5):341-51. PubMed ID: 11037686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.
    Pizzoni L; Ravnholt G; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 9699406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frictional forces when rectangular guiding arches with varying edge bevel are employed.
    Schumacher HA; Bourauel C; Drescher D
    J Orofac Orthop; 1998; 59(3):139-49. PubMed ID: 9640000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.