These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9282884)

  • 1. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli.
    Dolphin WF
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 9282884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones.
    Dolphin WF; Mountain DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3215-26. PubMed ID: 8300956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.
    Dolphin WF; Chertoff ME; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2225-34. PubMed ID: 7963035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous latency estimations for distortion product otoacoustic emissions and envelope following responses.
    Purcell DW; Van Roon P; John MS; Picton TW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2869-80. PubMed ID: 16708945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of brief-tone stimulus duration on the brain stem auditory steady-state response.
    Mo L; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 18091096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase-locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp-recorded amplitude due to across-frequency response interactions.
    Easwar V; Banyard A; Aiken SJ; Purcell DW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 48(10):3126-3145. PubMed ID: 30240514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid acquisition of auditory brainstem responses with multiple frequency and intensity tone-bursts.
    Mitchell C; Kempton JB; Creedon T; Trune D
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):38-46. PubMed ID: 8970812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating potential interactions between envelope following responses elicited simultaneously by different vowel formants.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():35-45. PubMed ID: 31176869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subcortical neural generators of the envelope-following response in sleeping children: A transfer function analysis.
    Lucchetti F; Nonclercq A; Avan P; Giraudet F; Fan X; Deltenre P
    Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 401():108157. PubMed ID: 33360182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase delays between tone pairs reveal interactions in scalp-recorded envelope following responses.
    Easwar V; Banyard A; Aiken S; Purcell D
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Feb; 665():257-262. PubMed ID: 29223866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coherence analysis of envelope-following responses (EFRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in infants and adults.
    Levi EC; Folsom RC; Dobie RA
    Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):21-7. PubMed ID: 8600128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The envelope following response: scalp potentials elicited in the Mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals.
    Dolphin WF; Mountain DC
    Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 58(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 1559908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the stimuli to evoke the amplitude modulation following response (AMFR) in neonates.
    Riquelme R; Kuwada S; Filipovic B; Hartung K; Leonard G
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):104-19. PubMed ID: 16518139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.