299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9283675)
1. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC
Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.
Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Increased risk of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters covered with transparent adhesive polyurethane bandages, compared to classical gauze bandages].
Meylan PR
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Dec; 117(50):2013-6. PubMed ID: 3324330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.
Gillies D; O'Riordan L; Carr D; Frost J; Gunning R; O'Brien I
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (4):CD003827. PubMed ID: 14583995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks.
Hoffmann KK; Weber DJ; Samsa GP; Rutala WA
JAMA; 1992 Apr; 267(15):2072-6. PubMed ID: 1532429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
Madeo M; Martin C; Nobbs A
J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9369626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters.
Webster J; Gillies D; O'Riordan E; Sherriff KL; Rickard CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; (11):CD003827. PubMed ID: 22071809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.
Maki DG; Ringer M
JAMA; 1987 Nov; 258(17):2396-403. PubMed ID: 3118061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of gauze versus transparent dressings for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
Pettit DM; Kraus V
Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 30(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 7567574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications.
Marsh N; Webster J; Mihala G; Rickard CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD011070. PubMed ID: 26068958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
Marsh N; Webster J; Mihala G; Rickard CM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Feb; 67():12-19. PubMed ID: 27889585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.
Hoffmann KK; Western SA; Kaiser DL; Wenzel RP; Groschel DH
Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun; 16(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 3408013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effectiveness of the transparent sterile dressing vs standard to fix the peripheral venous catheter (PVC) on the incidence of phlebitis. A randomized controlled trial].
Forni C; D'Alessandro F; Gambino O; Amodeo A; Pignotti E; Zanotti E; Tremosini M; Trofa C; Sabattini T; Matino F; Genco R; Schiavone M; Bombino C; Mini S; Rocchegiani L; Notarnicola T; Capezzali D; Boschi R; Loro L
Assist Inferm Ric; 2012; 31(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 22825293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral intravenous catheter dressing and securement practice is associated with site complications and suboptimal dressing integrity: A secondary analysis of 40,637 catheters.
Corley A; Ullman AJ; Mihala G; Ray-Barruel G; Alexandrou E; Rickard CM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Dec; 100():103409. PubMed ID: 31629208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A transparent polyurethane membrane used as an I.V. dressing.
Nicola M; DeChairo D
NITA; 1984; 7(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 6561401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative safety and costs of transparent versus gauze wound dressings in intravenous catheterization.
Chico-Padrón RM; Carrión-García L; Delle-Vedove-Rosales L; González-Vargas CS; Marrero-Perera M; Medina-Chico S; Rodríguez-Díaz MP; Alonso-Díaz M; Jiménez-Sosa A
J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 21407090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel technologies can provide effective dressing and securement for peripheral arterial catheters: A pilot randomised controlled trial in the operating theatre and the intensive care unit.
Reynolds H; Taraporewalla K; Tower M; Mihala G; Tuffaha HW; Fraser JF; Rickard CM
Aust Crit Care; 2015 Aug; 28(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 25583412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral intravenous therapy-related phlebitis rates in an adult population.
White SA
J Intraven Nurs; 2001; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11836840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of two securement techniques for short peripheral intravenous catheters.
Wood D
J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(6):280-5. PubMed ID: 9423389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
