172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9283846)
1. The impact of the October 1995 'pill scare' on oral contraceptive use in the United Kingdom: analysis of a general practice automated database.
Martin RM; Hilton SR; Kerry SM
Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 14(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 9283846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.
Flett G; Gurney E; McKessock L; Reid J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Apr; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9719702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral contraceptive use before and after the latest pill scare in The Netherlands. Changes in oral contraceptive use and how users change.
de Vries CS; van den Berg PB; de Jong-van den Berg LT
Contraception; 1998 Apr; 57(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 9649916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral contraceptive switching patterns in the United Kingdom: an important potential confounding variable in studies of venous thromboembolism.
Farmer RD; Lawrenson RA; Hambleton IR
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1996; 1(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 9678135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of 1995 pill scare on rates of venous thromboembolism among women taking combined oral contraceptives: analysis of general practice research database.
Farmer RD; Williams TJ; Simpson EL; Nightingale AL
BMJ; 2000 Aug 19-26; 321(7259):477-9. PubMed ID: 10948026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.
Smith LF; Whitfield MJ
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Aug; 45(397):409-14. PubMed ID: 7576845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 1995 pill scare revisited: anatomy of a non-epidemic.
Spitzer WO
Hum Reprod; 1997 Nov; 12(11):2347-57. PubMed ID: 9436662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'pill scare': the responses of authorities, doctors and patients using oral contraception.
Szarewski A; Mansour D
Hum Reprod Update; 1999; 5(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 10652972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the British warning on contraceptive use in the General Medical Service in Ireland.
Williams D; Kelly A; Carvalho M; Feely J
Ir Med J; 1998 Dec; 91(6):202-3. PubMed ID: 10069128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent oral contraceptive use patterns in four European countries: evidence for selective prescribing of oral contraceptives containing third-generation progestogens.
van Lunsen HW
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1996; 1(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 9678136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in conceptions before and after the 1995 pill scare.
Wood R; Botting B; Dunnell K
Popul Trends; 1997; (89):5-12. PubMed ID: 9368943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferential prescribing of type of combined oral contraceptive pill by general practitioners to teenagers with acne.
Rowlands S; Devalia H; Lawrenson R
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2001 Mar; 6(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11334479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The public health implications of the 1995 'pill scare'.
Furedi A
Hum Reprod Update; 1999; 5(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 10652971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of thrombotic risk factors when oral contraceptives are prescribed. A control-only study.
Lidegaard O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 Mar; 76(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 9093141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Another pill scare -- should we audit its impact?
Bromham DR
Audit Unit News; 1996 Jan; 1(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 12346948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of oral contraceptives in Denmark 1980-1990 and smoking habits among fertile women in 1990].
Lidegaard O
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Nov; 155(44):3550-8. PubMed ID: 8236576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The aftermath of a pill scare: regression to reassurance.
Spitzer WO
Hum Reprod Update; 1999; 5(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 10652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of prescription of PC4 by general practitioners in England and Wales.
Ineichen B; Logie J; Rowlands S; Lawrenson R
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Dec; 5(4):241-7. PubMed ID: 11245551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hormone replacement therapy: patterns of use studied through British general practice computerized records.
Lawrence M; Jones L; Lancaster T; Daly E; Banks E
Fam Pract; 1999 Aug; 16(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 10493702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why has antibiotic prescribing for respiratory illness declined in primary care? A longitudinal study using the General Practice Research Database.
Ashworth M; Latinovic R; Charlton J; Cox K; Rowlands G; Gulliford M
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Sep; 26(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 15454595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
