These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9283967)

  • 1. Effect of mixing method on selected properties of acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Nyman JS; Trieu HH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 9283967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 10674174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF
    Biomaterials; 2001 Jul; 22(13):1819-26. PubMed ID: 11396886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.
    Lewis G; Nyman J; Trieu HH
    Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):961-7. PubMed ID: 9690838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Austin GE
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 8580537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10331907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.
    Struemph JM; Chong AC; Wooley PH
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():193-8. PubMed ID: 26361465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
    Hansen D; Jensen JS
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Feb; 63(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acrylic bone-cement. Influence of mixer design and unmixed powder.
    Kurdy NM; Hodgkinson JP; Haynes R
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Oct; 11(7):813-9. PubMed ID: 8934321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of vacuum mixing on methylmethacrylate liberation from acrylic cement powder.
    Bettencourt A; Calado A; Amaral J; Vale FM; Rico JM; Monteiro J; Castro M
    Int J Pharm; 2001 May; 219(1-2):89-93. PubMed ID: 11337169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative roles of cement molecular weight and mixing method on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: Simplex P versus Osteopal.
    Lewis G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 10634961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
    Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vacuum-mixing cement does not decrease overall porosity in cemented femoral stems: an in vitro laboratory investigation.
    Messick KJ; Miller MA; Damron LA; Race A; Clarke MT; Mann KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1115-21. PubMed ID: 17785755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of test frequency on the in vitro fatigue life of acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Janna S; Carroll M
    Biomaterials; 2003 Mar; 24(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12504534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the Advanced One-Step Mixing System Under Non-Vacuum on the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement.
    Schommer JV; Chong AC; Erickson TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 38919359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical evaluation of pulse-echo ultrasonic test method for the determination of setting and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement: influence of mixing technique.
    Hagan CP; Orr JF; Mitchell CA; Dunne NJ
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():279-86. PubMed ID: 25260486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties.
    Smeds S; Goertzen D; Ivarsson I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):326-34. PubMed ID: 9005930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.