165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9284013)
1. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
Dowdle M
J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
Dowdle MA
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements.
Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Tien CY; Ratnam SS
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):800-2. PubMed ID: 1923200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artifactually elevated basal uterine tonus resulting from measurement of hydrostatic pressure by transducer-tipped intrauterine catheters.
Ross MG; Walton J
J Perinatol; 1994; 14(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 7830158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
Devoe LD; Croom CS; Youssef AA; Murray C
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrauterine pressure catheter performance in an in vitro uterine model: a stimulation of problems for intrapartum monitoring.
Devoe LD; Smith RP; Stoker R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 8336879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extramembranous placement of an air-coupled vs. transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure catheter.
Sciscione AC; Duhl A; Pollock MA; Hoffman MK; Rhee A; Colmorgen GH
J Reprod Med; 2005 Aug; 50(8):578-84. PubMed ID: 16220762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods.
Devoe LD; Gardner P; Dear C; Searle N
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):811-4. PubMed ID: 2795563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS
J Perinat Med; 1995; 23(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 8904472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrapartum uterine activity: evaluation of an intrauterine pressure transducer.
Strong TH; Paul RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):432-4. PubMed ID: 2915867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring.
Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Marossero D; Edwards RK
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1136-40. PubMed ID: 17470595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity.
Haran G; Elbaz M; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):412.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22284960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine manometry: reapplication of an old concept.
Strong TH; Ahn MO; Lipscomb KR; Masaki DI; Greenspoon JS; Paul RH
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Apr; 34(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1674478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS; Steer PJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 1606114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring uterine activity.
Allman AC; Steer PJ
Br J Hosp Med; 1993 May 5-18; 49(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 8508259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.
Hadar E; Biron-Shental T; Gavish O; Raban O; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25123517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The frequency of extramembranous placement of intrauterine pressure catheters.
Lind BK
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):185. PubMed ID: 10838348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.
Buhimschi CS; Saade GR; Buhimschi IA; Gokdeniz R; Boyle MB; Garfield RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 183(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10920311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
