These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9284683)

  • 1. Women's autonomy in childbirth. An absurd law that needs changing.
    Harwood RH
    BMJ; 1997 Aug; 315(7106):488. PubMed ID: 9284683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus.
    Meyer KC
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Refusal of invasive obstetrical intervention and the patient's right law].
    Peleg D; Ben-Rafael Z
    Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):50-1. PubMed ID: 9332060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section--a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden.
    Nieminen K; Stephansson O; Ryding EL
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):807-13. PubMed ID: 19488882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery.
    Bergeron V
    Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):478-87. PubMed ID: 17927624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developments in the law. Medical technology and the law.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 May; 103(7):1519-676. PubMed ID: 10106697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court-ordered caesarean sections: few norms.
    Smith AW; Rosen BF
    Healthspan; 1989 Dec; 6(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 10296558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mother v. fetus--the case of "do or die": in re A.C.
    Snyder DB
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():319-37. PubMed ID: 10293012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment.
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's autonomy in childbirth. Courts should also take evidence from obstetric anaesthetists.
    Holdcroft A
    BMJ; 1997 Aug; 315(7106):488. PubMed ID: 9284682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Studies on the effect of the directive of March 15, 1965 for application of section 11 of the law concerning mother and child protection and women's rights of Sept. 27, 1950 on requests for interruptions of pregnancy].
    Richter R; Schulz N
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1969 Feb; 15(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 5372521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Human rights, maternal mortality and reproductive health].
    Cook RJ
    Profamilia; 1993 Jun; 9(21):43-68. PubMed ID: 12344946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ethics of cesarean section by choice.
    Minkoff H
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):309-12. PubMed ID: 17011404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who wants a caesarean section? A study of women's personal experience of vaginal and caesarean delivery.
    Aslam MF; Gilmour K; Fawdry RD
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):364-6. PubMed ID: 12881072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections.
    Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protection of the rights of pregnant women in prisons and detention facilities.
    McHugh GA
    New Engl J Prison Law; 1980; 6(2):231-63. PubMed ID: 11655730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cesarean section and the rights of mother and child].
    Ogasawara K
    Josanpu Zasshi; 1988 Jun; 42(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 3418964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Compulsory care and compulsory treatment with help from the law].
    Laurell B
    Lakartidningen; 1976 Sep; 73(36):2887-8. PubMed ID: 987515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.