These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9285657)

  • 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics and frequency of implantable defibrillator use between randomized patients in the Antiarrhythmics Vs Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial and nonrandomized registry patients.
    Kim SG; Hallstrom A; Love JC; Rosenberg Y; Powell J; Roth J; Brodsky M; Moore R; Wilkoff B
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Aug; 80(4):454-7. PubMed ID: 9285657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the AVID and DAVID trials of implantable defibrillators.
    Sharma A; Epstein AE; Herre JM; Klein RC; Platia EV; Wilkoff B; Ledingham RB; Greene HL; Hallstrom AP;
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 95(12):1431-5. PubMed ID: 15950565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential impact of antiarrhythmic drugs versus implantable defibrillators on the management of ventricular arrhythmias: the Midlands trial of empirical amiodarone versus electrophysiologically guided intervention and cardioverter implant registry data.
    Pathmanathan RK; Lau EW; Cooper J; Newton L; Skehan JD; Garratt CJ; Griffith MJ
    Heart; 1998 Jul; 80(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 9764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Bollmann A; Husser D; Cannom DS
    Am J Cardiovasc Drugs; 2005; 5(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 16259525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients at lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence: a subgroup in whom implantable defibrillators may not offer benefit. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator (AVID) Trial Investigators.
    Hallstrom AP; McAnulty JH; Wilkoff BL; Follmann D; Raitt MH; Carlson MD; Gillis AM; Shih HT; Powell JL; Duff H; Halperin BD;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Mar; 37(4):1093-9. PubMed ID: 11263614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry.
    Cook JR; Rizo-Patron C; Curtis AB; Gillis AM; Bigger JT; Kutalek SP; Coromilas J; Hofer BI; Powell J; Hallstrom AP;
    Am Heart J; 2002 May; 143(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 12040343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causes of death in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Nov; 34(5):1552-9. PubMed ID: 10551706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and socioeconomic profile of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias in 1993 to 1995. AVID investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator.
    Domanski MJ; Saksena S; Wyse G; Hallstrom A; Schron EB; Nanda A; Nanda A; Kutalek S
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Aug; 80(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 9264422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of patient characteristics in the selection of patients for defibrillator implantation (the AVID Registry). Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.
    Curtis AB; Hallstrom AP; Klein RC; Nath S; Pinski SL; Epstein AE; Wyse G; Cannom DS; Renfroe E
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 May; 79(9):1185-9. PubMed ID: 9164882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and results of the antiarrhythmics vs implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry. The AVID Investigators.
    Anderson JL; Hallstrom AP; Epstein AE; Pinski SL; Rosenberg Y; Nora MO; Chilson D; Cannom DS; Moore R
    Circulation; 1999 Apr; 99(13):1692-9. PubMed ID: 10190878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antiarrhythmic drug use in the implantable defibrillator arm of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study.
    Steinberg JS; Martins J; Sadanandan S; Goldner B; Menchavez E; Domanski M; Russo A; Tullo N; Hallstrom A;
    Am Heart J; 2001 Sep; 142(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 11526368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Secondary prevention of sudden death: the Dutch Study, the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator Trial, the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg, and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.
    Cappato R
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 83(5B):68D-73D. PubMed ID: 10089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antiarrhythmic drugs versus implantable defibrillators: the need for a randomized controlled study.
    Greene HL
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):1171-8. PubMed ID: 8160597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subanalyses of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator trials: antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID), Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), and Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH).
    Oseroff O; Retyk E; Bochoeyer A
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 14688631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Therapeutic decision tree for patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias or aborted cardiac arrest: a critical review of the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillator trial and the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.
    Farré J; Cabrera JA; Romero J; Rubio JM
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):44K-51K. PubMed ID: 11084100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Stable" ventricular tachycardia is not a benign rhythm : insights from the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry.
    Raitt MH; Renfroe EG; Epstein AE; McAnulty JH; Mounsey P; Steinberg JS; Lancaster SE; Jadonath RL; Hallstrom AP;
    Circulation; 2001 Jan; 103(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 11208684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do baseline characteristics accurately discriminate between patients likely versus unlikely to benefit from implantable defibrillator therapy? Evaluation of the Canadian implantable defibrillator study implantable cardioverter defibrillatory efficacy score in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial.
    Exner DV; Sheldon RS; Pinski SL; Kron J; Hallstrom A
    Am Heart J; 2001 Jan; 141(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 11136493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: results from the AVID Registry. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.
    Epstein AE; Powell J; Yao Q; Ocampo C; Lancaster S; Rosenberg Y; Cannom DS; Herre JM; Greene HL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 34(4):1111-6. PubMed ID: 10520799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.
    Connolly SJ; Hallstrom AP; Cappato R; Schron EB; Kuck KH; Zipes DP; Greene HL; Boczor S; Domanski M; Follmann D; Gent M; Roberts RS
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Dec; 21(24):2071-8. PubMed ID: 11102258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical criteria for predicting benefit of ICD/PM in post myocardial infarction patients: an AVID and CAST analysis.
    Hallstrom AP; Wyse DG; McAnulty J; ;
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2008 Dec; 23(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 18810620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.