216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9286523)
1. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine.
Kreulen CM; de Soet JJ; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE
Caries Res; 1997; 31(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 9286523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects.
Weerheijm KL; Kreulen CM; de Soet JJ; Groen HJ; van Amerongen WE
Caries Res; 1999; 33(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9892780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo cariostatic effect of black copper cement on carious dentine.
Foley J; Blackwell A
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 12771500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal.
Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Sacono NT; Spolidorio DM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 19548010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine- containing glass ionomer cement in vivo: a pilot study.
Frencken JE; Imazato S; Toi C; Mulder J; Mickenautsch S; Takahashi Y; Ebisu S
Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 17284910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inhibition of cultivable bacteria by chlorhexidine treatment of dentin lesions treated with the ART technique.
Ersin NK; Uzel A; Aykut A; Candan U; Eronat C
Caries Res; 2006; 40(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16508277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro.
Creanor SL; Awawdeh LA; Saunders WP; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):527-31. PubMed ID: 9699447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro inhibition of marginal caries-like lesions with fluoride-containing amalgam.
Valenzuela VS; Abarca AM; Silva ND; Franco ME; Huerta JM
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):91-6. PubMed ID: 9028246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of glass-ionomer cement on carious dentine: an in vivo study.
Weerheijm KL; de Soet JJ; van Amerongen WE; de Graaff J
Caries Res; 1993; 27(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 8242680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Streptococcus mutans-induced secondary caries adjacent to glass ionomer cement, composite resin and amalgam restorations in vitro.
Gama-Teixeira A; Simionato MR; Elian SN; Sobral MA; Luz MA
Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 18060266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
Vaikuntam J
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
