These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9286844)

  • 1. The dean's letter: improving the summary evaluation.
    Hunt DD
    JAMA; 1997 Sep; 278(9):789. PubMed ID: 9286844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between dean's letter rankings and later evaluations by residency program directors.
    Lurie SJ; Lambert DR; Grady-Weliky TA
    Teach Learn Med; 2007; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A follow-up study of the characteristics of dean's letters.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren C; Scott C; Marshall SG; Braddock CH; Sarfaty S
    Acad Med; 2001 Jul; 76(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 11448831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of self-estimated scholastic standing in residency selection.
    Sklar DP; Tandberg D
    J Emerg Med; 1995; 13(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 8530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An open letter to those who write dean's letters.
    Saper CB
    Ann Neurol; 2016 Dec; 80(6):795-796. PubMed ID: 27859512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The "good" dean's letter.
    Kiefer CS; Colletti JE; Bellolio MF; Hess EP; Woolridge DP; Thomas KB; Sadosty AT
    Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1705-8. PubMed ID: 20881821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications.
    Leiden LI; Miller GD
    J Med Educ; 1986 Dec; 61(12):943-53. PubMed ID: 3783637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Carline J
    Acad Med; 1991 Jun; 66(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 2069654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of dean's letters in 1981 and 1992.
    Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Scott CS; Chu J; Leiden LI
    Acad Med; 1993 Dec; 68(12):905-11. PubMed ID: 8259964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dishonest dean's letter: an analysis of 532 dean's letters from 99 U.S. medical schools.
    Edmond M; Roberson M; Hasan N
    Acad Med; 1999 Sep; 74(9):1033-5. PubMed ID: 10498099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative performance information in the dean's letter.
    Curry RH; Yarnold PR; Wallace WH
    Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():24-9. PubMed ID: 3218863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of medical students: the dean's view.
    Lowe R
    Practitioner; 1980 Feb; 224(1340):169-71. PubMed ID: 7367370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter.
    Wagoner NE; Suriano JR
    Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):688-9. PubMed ID: 2803435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A program director's guide to the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (former dean's letter) with a database.
    Naidich JB; Grimaldi GM; Lombardi P; Davis LP; Naidich JJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 24713497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dean's letter of recommendation and resident performance.
    Stanton BC; Burstein AG; Kobos JC; Loucks S
    J Med Educ; 1979 Oct; 54(10):812-3. PubMed ID: 490597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of pass/fail grades to assess academic achievement and house staff performance.
    Stimmel B
    J Med Educ; 1975 Jul; 50(7):657-61. PubMed ID: 1138094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dean's letter: the preclinical years neglected.
    Marienfeld RD; Mengel CE
    J Med Educ; 1981 Apr; 56(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 7218302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the final adjective in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation on determination of applicant desirability.
    Ward MA; Palazzi DL; Lorin MI; Agrawal A; Frankenthal H; Turner TL
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1542922. PubMed ID: 30406730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More about who should oversee preparation of the dean's letter.
    Weissman S
    Acad Med; 2012 Jun; 87(6):681; author reply 681-2, 682. PubMed ID: 22643368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More about who should oversee preparation of the dean's letter.
    Gliatto P; Karani R; Anand S
    Acad Med; 2012 Jun; 87(6):680-1; author reply 681-2, 682. PubMed ID: 22643367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.