These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. On ghost authorship and reviews: the 6th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Baethge C Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Nov; 106(45):731-2. PubMed ID: 19997585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. Ross JS; Hill KP; Egilman DS; Krumholz HM JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(15):1800-12. PubMed ID: 18413874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen]. Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical journals turn gaze inward to examine process of peer review. Stephenson J JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(17):1389-91. PubMed ID: 9355982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors. Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ghostwriters in the scientific world. Yadav S; Rawal G Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 30():217. PubMed ID: 30574236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting. Anekwe TD Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Awareness of predatory publishing for Peruvian university professors and lecturers doing research. Sotomayor-Beltran C Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):390-395. PubMed ID: 32506970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Who owns what I say? Oral presentations, scientific publications, and 'the times'. Parrish R Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Sep; 112(9):1157-8. PubMed ID: 8085959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Whose article is it anyway? Larkin M Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9173):136. PubMed ID: 10408500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen. Michell B Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The sins of ghostwriting. Somberg JC Am J Ther; 2008; 15(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 18645328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Authors should publish their raw data. Nagelkerke NJ; Bernsen RM; Rizk DE Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1387-90. PubMed ID: 17876487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Full disclosure of financial interests in biomedical publications--a reminder. Bailey BJ Laryngoscope; 2002 Feb; 112(2):211-2. PubMed ID: 11889370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The system rewards a dishonest approach. Brookfield J Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]