These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9287876)

  • 1. The great mammogram debate.
    Wolfe S
    RN; 1997 Aug; 60(8):41-4. PubMed ID: 9287876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific uncertainty in clinical practice.
    Greiver M
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Sep; 44():1773-5, 1785-7. PubMed ID: 9789654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Bastani R; Maxwell AE; Bradford C; Das IP; Yan KX
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 10564627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The nurse's role in promoting breast cancer screening.
    Houfek JF; Waltman NL; Kile MA
    Nebr Nurse; 1997 Aug; 30(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 9400217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's compliance with public health guidelines for mammograms and pap tests in Canada and the United States: an analysis of data from the Joint Canada/United States Survey Of Health.
    Blackwell DL; Martinez ME; Gentleman JF
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):85-99. PubMed ID: 18182305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Qualitative analysis on screening mammography compliance among middle-aged women in Puerto Rico].
    Sańchez Ayéndez M; Davila AL; Bustillo M; Nazario CM; Larriuz MC; Martínez-Paz G
    P R Health Sci J; 2002 Sep; 21(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 12243113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Mayo MS; Markello SJ; Ahluwalia JS
    Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15313088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-reported mammography screening among Oklahoma women age 50 and older: Oklahoma Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 1997-2001.
    Campbell J; Bursac Z; Yerkes A; Li P; Baker K
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 95(10):646-52. PubMed ID: 12420414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass screening for breast cancer.
    Strax P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Jun; 68(6):457-66. PubMed ID: 17474655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening?
    Ahmed NU; Smith GL; Haber G; Belcon MC
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19111790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
    Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of physician communication in improving compliance with mammography screening among women ages 50-79 in a commercial HMO.
    MacDowell NM; Nitz-Weiss M; Short A
    Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 11146840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "False alarm" mammography results--how do women react?
    Kahn BE
    LDI Issue Brief; 2003 Feb; 8(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12678009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Another round in the mammography controversy.
    Meissner HI; Rimer BK; Davis WW; Eisner EJ; Siegler IC
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Apr; 12(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 12804357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer screening: success amid conflict.
    Leitch AM
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 8(4):657-72, vi. PubMed ID: 10452933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should there be a breast cancer risk chart for New Zealand women?
    Richardson A; Cox B; Graham P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Apr; 112(1086):129-30. PubMed ID: 10340689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.