These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9289046)
61. Carbon dioxide as an intravascular imaging agent: review. Patel BN; Kapoor BS; Borghei P; Shah NA; Lockhart ME Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2011; 40(5):208-17. PubMed ID: 21787987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. CO2 digital subtraction arteriography--advantages and current solutions for delivery and imaging. Hawkins IF; Caridi JG Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1995; 18(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 7648589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Carboxyangiography: a new type of opacification in angiographic practice--first clinical experience. Shipovskiĭ VN; Kurbanov RV; Saakian AM; Marov KB Angiol Sosud Khir; 2010; 16(4):73-9. PubMed ID: 21389948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Digital subtraction angiography with carbon dioxide in severe arterial ischemia and allergy to iodinated compounds]. Calvo Cascallo J; Mundi Salvadó N; Cardona Fontanet M Angiologia; 1993; 45(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 8393309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Carbon dioxide: an alternative to iodinated contrast media. Yusuf SW; Whitaker SC; Hinwood D; Henderson MJ; Gregson RH; Wenham PW; Hopkinson BR; Makin GS Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1995 Aug; 10(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 7655966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. ["Digital subtraction angiography based on carbon dioxide, technique and clinical application"]. Dimakakos P Vasa; 2000 Feb; 29(1):89. PubMed ID: 10731898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Carbon dioxide angiography: effect of injection parameters on bolus configuration. Lang EV; Gossler AA; Fick LJ; Barnhart W; Lacey DL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999 Jan; 10(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 10872489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Quantitative angiographic blood-flow measurement using pulsed intra-arterial injection. Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Fenster A Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2168-75. PubMed ID: 10535634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. CO2 digital subtraction angiography: potential complications and their prevention. Caridi JG; Hawkins IF J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 9152911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Renal angiography using carbon dioxide. Beese RC; Bees NR; Belli AM Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):3-6. PubMed ID: 10721312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Carbon Dioxide Angiography Is a Standard Technique to Supplement Iodinated Contrast Angiography and Can Be a Feasible Alternative. Stegemann E; Sansone R; Heiss C Angiology; 2016 Nov; 67(10):974. PubMed ID: 27436493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Carbon Dioxide As a Standard of Care for Zero Contrast Interventions: When, Why and How? Bisdas T; Koutsias S Curr Pharm Des; 2019; 25(44):4662-4666. PubMed ID: 31782359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The current status of the use of carbon dioxide in diagnostic and interventional angiographic procedures. Shaw DR; Kessel DO Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 16502161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Carbon dioxide as an angioscopic medium. Comparison to various methods of saline delivery. Mladinich CR; Akins EW; Weingarten KE; Hawkins IF Invest Radiol; 1991 Oct; 26(10):874-8. PubMed ID: 1960028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]