101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9289568)
1. [Improve the quality of quality work].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1997 Aug; 94(32-33):2715. PubMed ID: 9289568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The National Board of Heath and Welfare and myocardial infarction mortality].
Knutsson P
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(49):4525-6. PubMed ID: 8999233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Report from an accused hospital. Mistakes by the National Board of health and Welfare are not to be repeated!].
Ritter B; Stjerna A; Ericsson P
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(50):4628. PubMed ID: 8999258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Heart infarction registry or the art of medicine--can they be united?].
Lindström K; Järhult B
Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2258-9; discussion 2259-62. PubMed ID: 17822206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Care of myocardial infarction strongly improved 1995-2005. Quality registry, open statements and clear therapeutic goals have payed off].
Stenestrand U; Lindahl B; Wallentin L
Lakartidningen; 2007 May 14-29; 104(20-21):1580-3. PubMed ID: 17564264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. ["Open comparisons" no reliable measures of the quality of care in myocardial infarction. The epidemiological registry is not sufficient for county comparisons].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Aug 26-Sep 1; 106(35):2121-4. PubMed ID: 19827376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Are mortality figures from the National Board of Health and Welfare acceptable as a quality indicator in myocardial infarction?].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1997 May; 94(22):2116-8. PubMed ID: 9213671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Misdirected quality efforts. Criticism of the survey by the National Board of Health and Welfare on myocardial infarction mortality in Swedish hospitals].
Nilsson G; Holming K; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1996 Dec; 93(50):4624-5, 4627. PubMed ID: 8999256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [What is myocardial infarct? Quality assurance based on mortality figures is misleading if the diagnostic criteria are varying].
Nilsson G; Agert G
Lakartidningen; 1994 Jan; 91(1-2):28-9. PubMed ID: 8289549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Equally good care of myocardial infarction in Sweden today. Geographic differences in mortality are without significance for the individual patient].
Merlo J; Håkansson A; Beckman A; Lindblad U; Lindström M; Gerdtham UG; Råstam L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 3-16; 102(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 15707102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mortality an uncertain indicator in quality comparisons].
Björck S; Förars M
Lakartidningen; 2008 Aug 27-Sep 2; 105(35):2349. PubMed ID: 18831445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sensitive quality indicators stimulate improvement of care].
Britton M; Karlander S; Andersson B
Lakartidningen; 1999 Jan; 96(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 10068325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis of myocardial infarction mortality: open comparisons give better picture than Riks-HIA].
Björck S; Torgerson JS
Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2622-3. PubMed ID: 19927928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Geographical differences in mortality after myocardial infarction? Coincidence claims many victims--small hospitals suffer most of all!].
Merlo J; Håkansson A; Beckman A; Lindström M; Lindblad U; Gerdtham UG; Råstam L
Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 17-23; 102(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 15712743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Health data registries necessary for follow-up of the quality of health care!].
Köster M; Ljung R; Aberg A; Heurgren M
Lakartidningen; 2009 Sep 16-22; 106(38):2380. PubMed ID: 19848346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A bad day for quality control: sequential misplacement of left arm and left leg electrodes.
Greenfield JC
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 17727877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: "A bad day for quality control: sequential misplacement of left arm and left leg electrodes".
Rowlands DJ; Moore PR
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18191651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current patient records systems not sufficient as a basis for ranking lists].
Ryttberg B; Nyström E; Stenberg A; Palm K; Näslund I
Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 7-13; 106(41):2623. PubMed ID: 19927929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.
Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA
Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Guidelines, infarction care and quality].
Möller BH
Lakartidningen; 2004 Jun; 101(25):2205-6. PubMed ID: 15281310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
