BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9289749)

  • 1. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
    Voitik AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic templates for implant treatment planning.
    Garcia LT; Chung KH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 May; 24(5):384-6, 388, 390. PubMed ID: 12793222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical incorporation of computed tomography into daily implant treatment planning.
    Caldwell CS
    Tex Dent J; 2005 Apr; 122(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 15984368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose tomographic techniques for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Ekholm S; Johansson PE; Gröndahl HG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8908865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for cross-sectional implant site assessment in the posterior mandible.
    Rashedi B; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Chaffee NR; Guckes AD
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 14508739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of peri-implant bone changes with axial tomosynthesis.
    Horton RA; Ludlow JB; Webber RL; Gates W; Nason RH; Reboussin D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jan; 81(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 8850495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants.
    Petrikowski CG; Pharoah MJ; Schmitt A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2915335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.