These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9289749)

  • 1. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
    Voitik AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic templates for implant treatment planning.
    Garcia LT; Chung KH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 May; 24(5):384-6, 388, 390. PubMed ID: 12793222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical incorporation of computed tomography into daily implant treatment planning.
    Caldwell CS
    Tex Dent J; 2005 Apr; 122(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 15984368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-dose tomographic techniques for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Ekholm S; Johansson PE; Gröndahl HG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8908865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for cross-sectional implant site assessment in the posterior mandible.
    Rashedi B; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Chaffee NR; Guckes AD
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 14508739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of peri-implant bone changes with axial tomosynthesis.
    Horton RA; Ludlow JB; Webber RL; Gates W; Nason RH; Reboussin D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jan; 81(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 8850495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants.
    Petrikowski CG; Pharoah MJ; Schmitt A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 2915335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.