These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9290505)

  • 21. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jul; 60(7):578-86. PubMed ID: 16790829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
    Lee PH; Burstyn I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():54. PubMed ID: 27193095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in control of confounding].
    Xiang R; Dai WJ; Xiong Y; Wu X; Yang YF; Wang L; Dai ZH; Li J; Liu AZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1035-8. PubMed ID: 27453119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The problems with some epidemiological studies.
    Farmer R
    Maturitas; 2007 May; 57(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17399923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Power and sample size for observational studies of point exposure effects.
    Shook-Sa BE; Hudgens MG
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):388-398. PubMed ID: 33226116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size determination in epidemiologic studies.
    Wickramaratne PJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1995 Dec; 4(4):311-37. PubMed ID: 8745129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the power of the Cochran-Armitage test for trend in the presence of misclassification.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Laake P; Veierød MB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Jun; 23(3):218-43. PubMed ID: 21878460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An overview of confounding. Part 2: how to identify it and special situations.
    Howards PP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Apr; 97(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 29341101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.
    Ogburn EL; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2012 May; 23(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22450692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A power analysis for fidelity measurement sample size determination.
    Stokes L; Allor JH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 26962758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficient estimation of the attributable fraction when there are monotonicity constraints and interactions.
    Traskin M; Wang W; Ten Have TR; Small DS
    Biostatistics; 2013 Jan; 14(1):173-88. PubMed ID: 22730509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses.
    Austin PC; Brunner LJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1159-78. PubMed ID: 15057884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implications of measurement error in exposure for the sample sizes of case-control studies.
    McKeown-Eyssen GE; Tibshirani R
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 139(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 8109576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: uncorrelated errors.
    Marshall JR; Hastrup JL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 May; 143(10):1069-78. PubMed ID: 8629614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research.
    Groenwold RH; Nelson DB; Nichol KL; Hoes AW; Hak E
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 19948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Power and sample size calculations for generalized regression models with covariate measurement error.
    Tosteson TD; Buzas JS; Demidenko E; Karagas M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(7):1069-82. PubMed ID: 12652554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved procedures for estimation of disease prevalence using ranked set sampling.
    Chen H; Stasny EA; Wolfe DA
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):530-8. PubMed ID: 17638284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.
    Ciarleglio MM; Arendt CD
    Trials; 2017 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 28231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.