These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9290916)

  • 1. Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare.
    Beuscart-Zéphir MC; Brender J; Beuscart R; Ménager-Depriester I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Sep; 54(1-2):19-28. PubMed ID: 9290916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Digital Cognitive Aid for Anesthesia to Support Intraoperative Crisis Management: Results of the User-Centered Design Process.
    Schild S; Sedlmayr B; Schumacher AK; Sedlmayr M; Prokosch HU; St Pierre M;
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e13226. PubMed ID: 31033445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
    Niès J; Pelayo S
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the relationship between usability and technology-induced error: unraveling a complex interaction.
    Kushniruk A; Borycki E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 166():48-56. PubMed ID: 21685610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Do Clinical Information Systems Affect the Cognitive Demands of General Practitioners?: Usability Study with a Focus on Cognitive Workload.
    Ariza F; Kalra D; Potts HW
    J Innov Health Inform; 2015 Nov; 22(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 26855272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study.
    Peute LW; De Keizer NF; Van Der Zwan EP; Jaspers MW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():925-9. PubMed ID: 21893881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies.
    LeRouge C; Ma J; Sneha S; Tolle K
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e251-68. PubMed ID: 21481635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Feb; 37(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 15016386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major issues in user interface design for health professional workstations: summary and recommendations.
    Tang PC; Patel VL
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1994 Jan; 34(1-4):139-48. PubMed ID: 8125627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socio-technical systems and interaction design - 21st century relevance.
    Maguire M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 23856116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Materials management information systems.
    Health Devices; 1996; 25(2-3):48-100. PubMed ID: 8655344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usability evaluation of an emergency department information system prototype designed using cognitive systems engineering techniques.
    Clark LN; Benda NC; Hegde S; McGeorge NM; Guarrera-Schick TK; Hettinger AZ; LaVergne DT; Perry SJ; Wears RL; Fairbanks RJ; Bisantz AM
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():356-365. PubMed ID: 28166896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical workstations: identifying clinical requirements and understanding clinical information.
    Nowlan WA
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1994 Jan; 34(1-4):85-94. PubMed ID: 8125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics.
    Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Bigham R; Khajouei R
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jan; 133():104026. PubMed ID: 31733603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive computer-based video analysis: its application in assessing the usability of medical systems.
    Kushniruk AW; Patel VL
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1566-9. PubMed ID: 8591502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM.
    Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C
    J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot study on the effects of a computer-based medical image system.
    Wu SC; Smith JW; Swan JE
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():674-8. PubMed ID: 8947750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
    Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Scenario-Based Engineering Process (SEP): a user-centered approach for the development of health care systems.
    Harbison K; Kelly J; Burnell L; Silva J
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():763-5. PubMed ID: 8591321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.