BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

679 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9290951)

  • 1. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stepwise genetic changes associated with progression of nontumorigenic HPV-18 immortalized human prostate cancer-derived cell line to a malignant phenotype.
    Hukku B; Mally M; Cher ML; Peehl DM; Kung H; Rhim JS
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2000 Jul; 120(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 10942801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic characterization of cervical cancer cell lines.
    Harris CP; Lu XY; Narayan G; Singh B; Murty VV; Rao PH
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Mar; 36(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 12557223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive and definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of HeLa cells by spectral karyotyping.
    Macville M; Schröck E; Padilla-Nash H; Keck C; Ghadimi BM; Zimonjic D; Popescu N; Ried T
    Cancer Res; 1999 Jan; 59(1):141-50. PubMed ID: 9892199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of the human myeloid leukemia-derived cell line GF-D8 by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, subtelomeric probes, and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tosi S; Giudici G; Rambaldi A; Scherer SW; Bray-Ward P; Dirscherl L; Biondi A; Kearney L
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Mar; 24(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 10451701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic imbalances in CML blast crisis: 8q24.12-q24.13 segment identified as a common region of over-representation.
    Gribble SM; Reid AG; Roberts I; Grace C; Green AR; Nacheva EP
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Aug; 37(4):346-58. PubMed ID: 12800146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Somiari SB; Shriver CD; He J; Parikh K; Jordan R; Hooke J; Hu H; Deyarmin B; Lubert S; Malicki L; Heckman C; Somiari RI
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 15571796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined spectral karyotyping, multicolor banding, and microarray comparative genomic hybridization analysis provides a detailed characterization of complex structural chromosomal rearrangements associated with gene amplification in the osteosarcoma cell line MG-63.
    Lim G; Karaskova J; Vukovic B; Bayani J; Beheshti B; Bernardini M; Squire JA; Zielenska M
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Sep; 153(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 15350306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 20q gain associates with immortalization: 20q13.2 amplification correlates with genome instability in human papillomavirus 16 E7 transformed human uroepithelial cells.
    Savelieva E; Belair CD; Newton MA; DeVries S; Gray JW; Waldman F; Reznikoff CA
    Oncogene; 1997 Feb; 14(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 9053853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. M-FISH applications in clinical genetics.
    Cetin Z; Berker Karaüzüm S; Yakut S; Mihçi E; Baumer A; Wey E; Taçoy S; Bağci G; Lüleci G
    Genet Couns; 2005; 16(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 16259323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of breast cancer cell lines.
    Davidson JM; Gorringe KL; Chin SF; Orsetti B; Besret C; Courtay-Cahen C; Roberts I; Theillet C; Caldas C; Edwards PA
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 83(10):1309-17. PubMed ID: 11044355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of complex chromosomal abnormalities in uveal melanoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Naus NC; van Drunen E; de Klein A; Luyten GP; Paridaens DA; Alers JC; Ksander BR; Beverloo HB; Slater RM
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Mar; 30(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 11170284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amplification of 4q21-q22 and the MXR gene in independently derived mitoxantrone-resistant cell lines.
    Knutsen T; Rao VK; Ried T; Mickley L; Schneider E; Miyake K; Ghadimi BM; Padilla-Nash H; Pack S; Greenberger L; Cowan K; Dean M; Fojo T; Bates S
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Jan; 27(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 10564593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas.
    Robanus-Maandag EC; Bosch CA; Kristel PM; Hart AA; Faneyte IF; Nederlof PM; Peterse JL; van de Vijver MJ
    J Pathol; 2003 Sep; 201(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 12950019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Delineating a supernumerary marker chromosome by combining several cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques].
    Tan YQ; Di YF; Song YZ; Cheng DH; Li LY; Lu GX
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 17680527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of oral squamous cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Uchida K; Oga A; Okafuji M; Mihara M; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Chochi Y; Ueyama Y; Sasaki K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Jun; 167(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 16737909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular-cytogenetic analysis of fragmentation of chromosome 17 in the breast cancer cell line EFM-19.
    Rogalla P; Helbig R; Drieschner N; Flohr AM; Krohn M; Bullerdiek J
    Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):1987-92. PubMed ID: 12174875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer: a comparison between cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Persson K; Pandis N; Mertens F; Borg A; Baldetorp B; Killander D; Isola J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Jun; 25(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 10337995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytogenetic, spectral karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization characterization of two new secondary leukemia cell lines with 5q deletions, and MYC and MLL amplification.
    Knutsen T; Pack S; Petropavlovskaja M; Padilla-Nash H; Knight C; Mickley LA; Ried T; Elwood PC; Roberts SJ
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Jul; 37(3):270-81. PubMed ID: 12759925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chromosomal aberrations evaluated by CGH, FISH and GTG-banding in a case of AIDS-related Burkitt's lymphoma.
    Zunino A; Viaggi S; Ottaggio L; Fronza G; Schenone A; Roncella S; Abbondandolo A
    Haematologica; 2000 Mar; 85(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 10702812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.