These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9292736)

  • 1. Use of statistical analysis of cytologic interpretation to determine the causes of interobserver disagreement and in quality improvement.
    Renshaw AA; Lee KR; Granter SR
    Cancer; 1997 Aug; 81(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 9292736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Receiver operating characteristic curves for analysis of the results of cervicovaginal smears. A useful quality improvement tool.
    Renshaw AA; Dean BR; Cibas ES
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):968-75. PubMed ID: 9302930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
    Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis: study of CRISAP Ile-de-France].
    Barrès D; Bergeron C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Feb; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 10758586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of pulsed arterial spin labeling for glioma grading.
    Kim MJ; Kim HS; Kim JH; Cho KG; Kim SY
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 18415790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
    Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Interobserver reproducibility in cervical smears and corresponding thin-layer preparations.
    Lee KR; Darragh TM; Joste NE; Krane JF; Sherman ME; Hurley LB; Allred EM; Manos MM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 11789738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
    Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of the AutoPap (currently Focalpoint) primary screening system location guide use on interpretation time and diagnosis.
    Ronco G; Vineis C; Montanari G; Orlassino R; Parisio F; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Fabbrini T; Segnan N
    Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12704687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies.
    Downs-Kelly E; Mendelin JE; Bennett AE; Castilla E; Henricks WH; Schoenfield L; Skacel M; Yerian L; Rice TW; Rybicki LA; Bronner MP; Goldblum JR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2333-40; quiz 2341. PubMed ID: 18671819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
    Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
    Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
    Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
    Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smears diagnosed as ASCUS: interobserver variation and follow-up.
    Gatscha RM; Abadi M; Babore S; Chhieng D; Miller MJ; Saigo PE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Aug; 25(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 11477722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [BVC (bias to variance characteristic) analysis].
    Matsumoto T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Dec; 34(13):1539-47. PubMed ID: 2622045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver and intraobserver differences in the diagnosis of urothelial cells. Comparison with classification by computer.
    Sherman AB; Koss LG; Adams SE
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Jun; 6(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 6465696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of disagreement: a new information-based approach.
    Costa-Santos C; Antunes L; Souto A; Bernardes J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 20538199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usefulness of physical examination in detecting the presence or absence of anemia.
    Nardone DA; Roth KM; Mazur DJ; McAfee JH
    Arch Intern Med; 1990 Jan; 150(1):201-4. PubMed ID: 2297289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.