204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9292928)
1. Treating problem behaviors maintained by negative reinforcement.
Cipani E; Spooner F
Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(5):329-42. PubMed ID: 9292928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further Evaluation of the Use of Multiple Schedules for Behavior Maintained by Negative Reinforcement.
Campos C; Leon Y; Sleiman A; Urcuyo B
Behav Modif; 2017 Mar; 41(2):269-285. PubMed ID: 27680584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior.
DeLeon IG; Neidert PL; Anders BM; Rodriguez-Catter V
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 11800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-specific control conditions for functional analyses.
Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Querim AC; Harper JM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24114085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of extinction, noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior as control procedures.
Thompson RH; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Dozier CL; Samaha AL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):221-38. PubMed ID: 12858986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A component analysis of schedule thinning during functional communication training.
Betz AM; Fisher WW; Roane HS; Mintz JC; Owen TM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):219-41. PubMed ID: 24114096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.
Van Camp CM; Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Contrucci SA; Vorndran CM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 11214030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.
Lalli JS; Vollmer TR; Progar PR; Wright C; Borrero J; Daniel D; Barthold CH; Tocco K; May W
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 10513025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of various forms of reinforcement with and without extinction as treatment for escape-maintained problem behavior.
Carter SL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):543-6. PubMed ID: 21358917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement.
Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Vorndran CM; Kuhn SA; LaRue RH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11936544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus (instructional) fading during extinction of self-injurious escape behavior.
Pace GM; Iwata BA; Cowdery GE; Andree PJ; McIntyre T
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 8331017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.
Peck SM; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Cooper LJ; Brown KA; Richman D; McComas JJ; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):263-90. PubMed ID: 8810061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The communicative function hypothesis: an operant behavior perspective.
Cipani E
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1990 Dec; 21(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 2094737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of response preference on resistance to change.
Ringdahl JE; Berg WK; Wacker DP; Crook K; Molony MA; Vargo KK; Neurnberger JE; Zabala K; Taylor CJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):265-280. PubMed ID: 29319190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
